Thank you, and we’re listening

tumblr.com — Yesterday we introduced a new version of our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service that will take effect in thirty days. These two documents help communicate as clearly as possible our relationship with the users of Instagram so you understand how your data will be used, and the rules that govern the thriving and active Instagram community.
"Thank you & we're listening": Now #Instagram says they won't sell user photos to advertisers t.co/ewYmp2qI via @LindseyMastis
Here's #Instagram latest blog post saying "T'you & we're listening." U tell me if u believe they won't sell your photos t.co/hjmMyszp
Here's the Instagram post that says they're reversing the policy! Your outrage changed their minds!!! Good job! t.co/PbZUmqkW
‘Instagram does not claim any ownership rights’ RT @instagram: Thank you, and we’re listening: t.co/Z29qniH2
Hmmm, hard to know yet what to make of @instagram's little bit of backpedaling and clarification t.co/rB5p17Iz
Facebook responds 2 anger over new Instagram privacy changes and says...wait...we didn't mean it like that. t.co/EOmcV2S3
Backdown,much? RT @theburgerman: Thank you, and we’re listening: Instagram releases more details about privacy policy | t.co/2lu1gd9D
Instagram admits that it screwed up royally with its new "privacy" policy, says "not what we meant," will rewrite. t.co/mHNqGyLq
Thank you, and we’re listening: Instagram releases more details about privacy policy | t.co/Dy0mTSkf
RT @nytjim: Instagram: "This language is confusing ... It is not our intention to sell your photos." t.co/bzGyV8IN
Instagram aren't selling our photos so we can all relax and have a cup of tea, says co-founder t.co/01uDalUp (via @MirandaPorter)
Had Instagram used a tool like @mmasnick's Insight Community t.co/mnkemsNp it could have avoided today's events: t.co/T5vQ3ZSX
Less than 24 hours after nearly shooting themselves in the foot and ruining everything, Instagram does the right thing t.co/KWK4QHtX
Instagram: "This language is confusing ... It is not our intention to sell your photos." t.co/bzGyV8IN
I see that (here): Feeling heat, #Instagram says "we're listening": t.co/ZA0nYBTr RT @paulcomp: Systrom has since clarified
Feeling heat, #Instagram says "we're listening" & will "modify specific terms" of use." Please stay tuned." t.co/bzGyV8IN
RT @shalailah: Instagram posts "clarification" on privacy changes: t.co/IygCgfuC They're going into damage-control but too late t ...
It's alright, says @Instagram, you were just confused by all that nasty lawyerspeak ... t.co/bp0uio7Q
RT @gen: too late. I'm back to Flickr. “@newsycombinator: Instagram's official response t.co/qd3cPwnz
In #privacy damage control mode, #Instagram cofounder Kevin Systrom says service won't use your photos as advertising: t.co/G53gbUrv
It is now safe to continue instagraming! Good job Behaving Baders!!! Instagram has had an Insta-change of... t.co/C51nOnlO
RT @sarnaudAFP: #Instagram : 'sounds' like they got the message and are now clear about their intentions t.co/nXCQmLl6 MT @koci
RT @EricCarvin: "It is not our intention to sell your photos" — @Instagram explains changes in their terms of service: t.co/EbKlHm0N
RT @sethalemon: BREAKING NEWS: Instagram responds, says it WON’T sell photos t.co/crM2bcVV
I'll believe it when I see the "updated" language that shows you are truly not overreaching, Instagram: t.co/EnpDRs6W
Instagram: "Legal documents are easy to misinterpret.' t.co/1Hu8tSit Really? They shouldn't be.
RT @courtneyfischer: “@instagram: Thank you, and we're listening: t.co/bBf0vimx” insta responds to the news!
RT @patrickwitty: Instagram responds. "To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos." Intention? Or right? t.co/2RqlHdcb
RT @EricCarvin: "It is not our intention to sell your photos" — @Instagram explains changes in their terms of service: t.co/EbKlHm0N
#Instagram statement says it will remove the language that made people think their photos could be used as ads: t.co/Lzgx6ZII
Instagram co-founder says, "Chill, people..." t.co/1L5Q4uj9
Not so fast: Instagram reverses course, says has no plans to own or sell users' photos, or use them in ads t.co/W2Cu2gVC via @cnntech
What'd I tell you. #Instagram is sorry. As for "Legal documents are easy to misinterpret," they don't HAVE to be. t.co/6ofdHCva
Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom blogs to clarify recent changes to @instagram. t.co/1WYWSOSx #instagram
+ "Our intenstion" RT @ron_fournier: Define "is" MT @EricCarvin: "It is not our intention to sell your photos" t.co/tZ6M7Bjx
#Instagram posts an explanation about its updated privacy policy, says it will modify parts of terms: t.co/SbI02QJl
Kevin Systrom, @Instagram: "To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos." t.co/ZlG6TDDq
Instagram releases statement about the new privacy policy t.co/wikqiLJh
hooray everyone can calm down now right? RT @PandoDaily: Instagram: "It is not our intention to sell your photos" (t.co/2tRWLgYS)
Well that was fast. Instagram responds to users' demands to clarify changes in privacy policies, denying major charges: t.co/6VB174Uo
No need to panic...you can keep your Instagram accounts. They've backpedaled on those changes: t.co/VrIv2hy9 #SighOfRelief
.@Instagram doesn't say the “royalty-free, transferable...worldwide license to use the Content" is going away, does it? t.co/HJVmjIFe
"It is not our intention to sell your photos" — @Instagram explains changes in their terms of service: t.co/EbKlHm0N
"Instagram users own their content and Instagram does not claim any ownership rights over your photos." t.co/2wTdvKnK
RT @lheron: Instagram: "It is not our intention to sell your photos." Will cut language suggesting photos can be in ads t.co/XMP2tBeX
Instagram addresses its freaked-out users: 'It is not our intention to sell your photos' t.co/Nd6lnr3y
RT @jaredbkeller: Instagram addresses its freaked-out users: 'It is not our intention to sell your photos' t.co/vHglSiyc
I am SO taking a pic of my dinner and adding a filter. RT @CharlesBloomSC: Looks like Instagram was listening ... t.co/ovAOv0m8
Instagram '...we will be doing more to answer your questions, fix any mistakes, and eliminate the confusion' t.co/Tu5Vfevf #Instagram
Customers apparently misunderstood legal language @instagram now says. So to clarify they are changing it. t.co/O8e4NRov #socialmedia
… 2-1: As I predicted, Instagram walks back some of its licensing changes t.co/ongyavac
RT @Lavrusik: Clarifications on Instagram's TOS: t.co/u9bcmF0s "To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos...."
anyone else bugged by the missing comma in the signature? t.co/BonKa4Vc oh, never mind.
RT @PSFK: Statement from Instagram: We're not selling your photos & we do not claim any ownership rights t.co/Gx4G2GI8
t.co/Cw1WQzux Instagram responds to furore - "not true" that photos will be sold to others without compensation
.@Instagram on new privacy policy/terms of service: "Thank You, and we're listening". Says you still own photos t.co/j35rq785
.@Instagram backpedals. That didn't take too long. We'll see what they change. t.co/0EjwNy6Q
#Instagram posts modification to new terms of service because, "legal terms are easy to misinterpret" t.co/S91o9EpW
"To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos." t.co/E2LApcgD
RT @tone_def: Well, that didn't last long. RT @instagram: Thank you, and we're listening: t.co/axxFQ9su
Instagram co-founder: "Nothing has changed about the control you have over who can see your photos"$FB t.co/0kI0RybG
Instagram calms everyone down in blogpost: 'no, of course we won't be selling your photos to companies'... t.co/T7zpjUMk #byehysteria
RT @ckanal: "To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos." t.co/A2nBXR2B Could their intention change? Weak language
Everyone calm down. RT @JeffElder: #Instagram responds on its blog: "It is not our intention to sell your photos." t.co/GGCEWQ1J
Instagram promises changes, says no intent to sell photos. t.co/f55poIBh / enough to calm the waters? or 2 little 2 late?
Picture this Instagram: Egg on face and moonwalking it backwards. t.co/Ixv7sfM5
OOPS: @Instagram apologizes for confusion, says it's not selling your pics but wants to experiment w/ innovative ads. t.co/Xe6DdEs5
#Instagram responds on its blog: "It is not our intention to sell your photos." t.co/GwpNYpHj
"we’re going to remove the language that raised the question." @instagram backpedaling on Terms of Service kerfuffle t.co/JRQExTyI
Instagram says they are listening: t.co/ei9a6yrg Question is, is that enough for people not to delete their accounts?
Thank you, and we’re listening @Instagram Blog in response to response to TOS changes... t.co/KKm4zI4e
So Instagram hits the reverse ferret button. @indiaknight can be pleased. I think. t.co/SwV96bg4
"To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos." t.co/oCb72vrk Could their intention change? Weak language
Since I do almost no lifecasting and like Flickr for its Creative Commons feature I never created an Instagram account. t.co/T5vQ3ZSX
Instagram statement: t.co/wiZCqn2G Not entirely convincing. But am prepared to give them chance to fix this, cos it is a good service
i plan to take the words in the new Instagram blog post, reorder them and sell the product as 'freelance work' t.co/T3ZmkQNK
.@Instagram co-founder: "I always want you to feel comfortable sharing your photos on Instagram..." t.co/eGNZ0pwV
Backfired on them pretty quick right? RT @hubertallen: And then Instagram was all, "my bad." t.co/g1d26qa4
RT @lheron: Instagram: "It is not our intention to sell your photos." Will cut language suggesting photos can be in ads t.co/KZkWpKUJ
Instagram blog: "It is not our intention to sell your photos." t.co/x95TkX9m
RT @digiphile: "it is not our intention to sell your photos"-@Kevin t.co/KFnheeo3 @Instagram: we won't make user photos into ads.
predicted change in policy due to user outrage came quicker than normal this time - t.co/y1YZuhwu
RT @vplus: Instagram responds >>> RT @instagram Thank you, and we're listening: t.co/cuWeXn8h
"To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos" sez Instagram: t.co/OcxIUVTJ
Instagram reponds: not selling your photos; you own your pics; yes, you might be in ads; expect more to come t.co/n7mUCgJO
Instagram: "We’re going to remove the language that raised the question." t.co/9DtqMOci
The folks at #instagram issue a 'stop beating the sh*t out of us' letter in response to policy change blowback t.co/TkxaXiXp
Instagram will remove the language about using your photos in ads in its new Terms of Agreement. t.co/k4gH5tZE
Instagram: "It is not our intention to sell your photos." Will cut language suggesting photos can be in ads t.co/ueC1qPPH
So there, Merry Christmas, everyone! RT @instagram Thank you, and we're listening: t.co/nfnPvvGw
This is the most hilarious document I've read in a while. Of *course* Instamagram wants to sell your photos for free. t.co/KjSH0lLK
Instagram to update its Terms of Service to something less diabolically evil. t.co/xRS0YgQx
"it is not our intention to sell your photos"-@Kevin t.co/4QVyoqv2 @Instagram: we won't make user photos into ads.
Sounds like this could be promising. Shall wait and see. RT @instagram: Thank you, and we're listening: t.co/A2nBXR2B
Some clarification from @instagram about the TOS changes w/answers re: private accts and ads t.co/7KPWVfwV
Instagram: "To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos. " t.co/Qngx2472 #ohthankgoodness
And @instagram retreats a bit. Plans to change language in privacy policies. t.co/ZrajlPiy
"We do not have plans [to make photos into ads] and because of that we’re going to remove the language." #instagram t.co/ocpnBWfO
Instagram responds to users, says it has no plans to use images in ads, and that private images are still private. t.co/9QdQKIWH
Instagram's response should calm things down some. They won't sell photos or let them be used in ads. t.co/CnnJvu85
Here's the @instagram statement. "...we’ve heard loud and clear that many users are confused and upset…" t.co/VJfIluOU
.@instagram statement: "We’ve heard loud and clear that many users are confused and upset about what the changes mean" t.co/WzC5xcdf
NEW: @instagram just posted an explanation of their new Terms of Service on their blog "we're listening" t.co/JRQExTyI
Instagram responds to backlash, saying they're committed to "fix any mistakes and eliminate the confusion" ► t.co/8494GoiP
And watching. Watching verrrrry closely. RT @instagram: Thank you, and we're listening: t.co/g9c4XhPx
“Instagram users own their content and Instagram does not claim any ownership rights over your photos.” says @instagram t.co/evNwhtZG
"We do not have plans [to use your Instagrams in ads] and we’re going to remove the language that raised the question." t.co/Gb5g8sST
"Nothing has changed about the control you have over who can see your photos." - @instagram's response: t.co/qV872E5m
Surprise, surprise: Instagram confesses that they stepped in it with the new ToS: t.co/oLUIGGPh
"If you set your photos to private, Instagram only shares your photos with the people you’ve approved to follow you." t.co/JIUUx29T
Instagram: "To be clear: it is not our intention to sell your photos." t.co/cq6DaBiy
Does this mean the Flickr notifications will stop? RT @instagram: Thank you, and we're listening: t.co/7x2H24ru
I (still) don't trust Instagram because I don't trust Facebook, but here's their attempt at clarification t.co/tG7l20Bj
Instagram's response: "Thank You, and We're Listening" - t.co/GkPCYkgp
"It was interpreted by many that we were going to sell... photos to others without any compensation. This is not true" t.co/I7JvmXOm
Before you go and delete your account... RT @instagram: Thank you, and we're listening: t.co/bsSMBzf4