Social networks did not fix democracies. Why believe they will salvage audience interaction? Despite the seemingly endless powers of social media, you should never leave anybody else with the responsibility of your audience. In the long run journalism’s job is at the helm, ensuring trust in public information. In hindsight, there was obviously not as much to gain as we were promised by handing away the keys to our audience to the social networks.
Despite the seemingly boundless powers of social media, you should never leave anybody else with the responsibility for your audience. In the long run, journalism’s job is at the helm, ensuring trust in public information. In hindsight, there was obviously not as much to gain as we were promised in handing the keys to our audience to the social networks. The promise of democratic and meritocratic opportunity spaces where journalism could be vitalized by new readers has gradually faded.
FBI-sjef James Comey nevnte sin anonyme Instagram-konto. Det burde han kanskje ikke gjort. Det er ingen hemmelighet at Comey er glad i eget privatliv, og vi har tidligere omtalt hvordan han selv bruker limbånd for å dekke webkameraet sitt.
@random_walker That’s too easy. Have you considered the news sites own dependencies on these trackers? Investigating would in part be biting the hand that feeds. Perhaps explaining why @ProPublica are the ones doing the dirty work?
Muck Rack makes it simple to find people, tweets, or articles that mention any name, keyword, company, hashtag etc. We've compiled this guide to help you make the most of your search.
Selecting a term
Start searching tweets, articles from media outlets, articles mentioned in tweets, journalists'
names, titles and bios with some suggested searches:
Companies or Topics (e.g. iPhone, Microsoft)
Phrases (e.g. "cloud computing") — use quotes to keep the terms together
Twitter handles (e.g. @username) — returns those who have mentioned or replied to
Names (e.g. "David Pogue")
Hashtags (e.g. #sxsw, #london2012)
Bio details (e.g. vegan, Olympics, father)
Muck Rack's Advanced Search allows for many boolean operators.
Find results that mention multiple specified terms, use AND or
+. For example, ensure each result contains both Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg by
searching Musk AND Zuckerberg or Musk + Zuckerberg.
Use the operators OR or , to broaden your search when you'd like either of
multiple terms to appear in results. (This is the default behavior of our search when no operators
are used). For example, results will contain either cake or cookie by searching cake OR cookie or cake,cookie
Use NOT or - to subtract results from your search. For
example, searching Disney will yield results about the Walt Disney Company as well as Walt Disney
World Resort. To exclude mentions of Disney World, search for Disney -World or Disney
When using one of these operators with a phrase, enclose it in quotation marks. For example, you can
find results about smartphones excluding Apple's iPhone 4S by searching smartphone -"iPhone
Exact case matching or punctuation
If you're searching for a brand name or keyword that relies on specific punctuation marks or capitalization, you can
find results that match your exact query by adding matchcase: before the keyword you're searching for, like matchcase:E*TRADE .
Use parentheses to separate multiple
boolean phrases. For example, to find journalists talking about having fun in Disney World or
Disneyland, search for ("disney world" OR disneyland) AND fun.
An asterisk can be used to search for any variation of a root word truncated by the asterisk. For example, searching for admin* will return results for administrator, administration, administer, administered, etc.
A near operator is an AND operator where you can control the distance between the words. You can vary the distance the near operation uses by adding a forward slash and number (between 0-99) such as strawberries NEAR/10 "whipped cream", which means the strawberries must exist within 10 words of "whipped cream".