Leagle, Inc.
Online/Digital
Leagle, Inc. is a leading provider of copies of primary caselaw from all Federal courts and all State higher courts. Our collection is up to date within 24 hours of release of opinions from the courts and is also complete historically for all time for Federal courts and back to 1950 for state appellate and supreme courts. We add Slip Opinions daily, and Advance Sheets and Bound Volume copies as they become available. Our materials are fully copyrighted by Leagle, Inc. Source
Actions
Media Outlet details
| Scope | National |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Country | United States of America |
Similarweb UVM
|
Request pricing |
Comscore UVM
|
Request pricing |
Recent Articles
Search ArticlesIN RE STARBUCKS CORPORATI
STIPULATION TO STAY CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE CASE AND ORDER STIPULATION TO STAY CONSOLIDATED DERIVATIVE CASE Pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Rule 42(a)") and Local Civil Rule 42, Plaintiffs Katherine King and Portia McCollum ("Plaintiffs"), Defendants Laxman Narasimhan... Let's get started Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders. Updated daily. Uncompromising quality.
FOOTE v. LUDLOW SCHOOL CO
Courts nationwide have faced all manner of important litigation involving matters of gender identity and gender expression, including use of folks' preferred pronouns. Today's case falls under that broad header. More specifically, it presents for our review challenging issues arising from the Ludlow School Committee's protocol ("the Protocol... Let's get started Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case.
US SYNTHETIC CORP. v. INT
US Synthetic Corp. (USS) filed a complaint with the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) alleging that Intervenors, among others, violated 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (section 337) based upon the importation, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain products... Let's get started Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders. Updated daily.
CITY OF NEW YORK v. EXXON
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 007) 69-78, 109-134, 162, 163, 177-180, 193-196, 212-214, 222-223 were read on this MOTION TO DISMISS. The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 008) 86-103, 108, 166, 167, 181-190, 218-220, 222-223 were... Let's get started Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders. Updated daily.
MALATESTA v. RECKITT BENC
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiffs Theodore Malatesta and Maria Gloria Pena commenced this action on April 3, 2023, alleging tort claims for injuries arising out of the use of a Lysol spray can. (ECF No. 1). On October 23, 2023, counsel for plaintiffs filed a Motion to... Let's get started Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders. Updated daily. Uncompromising quality. Complete, Accurate, Current.
ZAERPOUR v. BANK OF AMERI
SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING TO A...
UNITED STATES v. BELFIORE
SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING TO A...
PERCIAVALLE v. McDONOUGH
In 2006, veteran Robert Fleming began applying to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), under Title 38 of the United States Code, for disability benefits for service-connected injuries. In May 2016, Mr. Fleming entered into a contingent-fee agreement with James Perciavalle for the latter to serve as his accredited representative... Let's get started Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GARCIA v. UNITED STATES
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Mr. Jim Garcia, an Army veteran, appeals a decision of the Court of Federal Claims. In the Court of Federal Claims, Mr. Garcia sought an increase in his combat-related special compensation ("CRSC") and associated back pay as well as compensation for emotional and psychological stress caused... Let's get started Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
UNITED STATES v. NIGRO
SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE...