Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Abrams DB
Independent and combined effects of very low nicotine cigarette messages and e-cigarette messages: a randomised clinical trial
Discussion In light of pending FDA regulations to reduce nicotine in combusted cigarettes to minimally addictive levels,4 8 this RCT assessed the effects of messages about VLNCs, messages about e-cigarettes and the combination of VLNC and e-cigarette messages in three key populations: adults who smoked cigarettes exclusively, adults who used both cigarettes and e-cigarettes and young adults who never smoked.
Effect of nicotine corrective messaging on nicotine-related beliefs in US adults: a randomised controlled trial
Methods This study examines the effect of multiple exposures to a brief NCM intervention on nicotine, NRT, e-cigarette and RNC cigarette-related beliefs, and likelihood of subsequent tobacco and nicotine use in a population sample of adults.
Changes in Tobacco Dependence and Association with Onset and Progression of Use by Product Type from Wave 1 to Wave 3 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study - PubMed
Save citation to file Format: Add to My Bibliography Your saved search Name of saved search: Search terms: Frequency: Which day? Which day? Report format: Send at most: Send even when there aren't any new results Optional text in email: Create a file for external citation management software
Responses to reduced nicotine cigarette marketing features: a systematic review
Results As outlined in figure 1, 4092 articles were identified for evaluation using the search criteria. A total of 3971 articles were screened out based on their titles/abstracts. We reviewed 121 full-text publications for eligibility. Of those, 26 were eligible and 95 were ineligible.
Messaging about very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs) to influence policy attitudes, harm perceptions and smoking motivations: a discrete choice experiment
Effects of VLNC message attributes Table 3 displays regression model coefficients for each task (analytic samples; choice indifferent excluded). Direct effects for all tasks replicated the displayed results both with and without the choice-indifferent sample. Specifically, results did not differ in direction or significance for any estimate on account of including or excluding choice-indifferent participants.
Messaging about very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs) to influence policy attitudes, harm perceptions and smoking motivations: a discrete choice experiment
Table 3 displays regression model coefficients for each task (analytic samples; choice indifferent excluded). Direct effects for all tasks replicated the displayed results both with and without the choice-indifferent sample. Specifically, results did not differ in direction or significance for any estimate on account of including or excluding choice-indifferent participants.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Abrams
Contact Abrams, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack