In Muransky v. Godiva, the Eleventh Circuit held that a violation of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) was insufficient to allege a concrete injury for standing purposes. Background Dr. David Muransky filed a class action complaint against Godiva Chocolatier after he received a printed credit card receipt that contained credit card information in excess of the permissible number of digits under FACTA. One of the goals of FACTA is to prevent identity theft.
