Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Ariel Solose
Clauses clés dans les contrats de construction : Conseils pratiques pour assurer la réussite des projets
BC Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP More Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) is one of Canada's top business law firms, serving a diverse national and international client base. Our integrated office network provides clients with access to the Firm's full spectrum of capabilities in virtually every area of business law. Le contexte juridique et commercial au sein du secteur de la construction étant en constante évolution, les contrats connexes doivent suivre le pas.
Clauses clés dans les contrats de construction : Conseils pratiques pour assurer la réussite des projets
Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page. Blakes periodically provides materials on our services and developments in the law to interested persons.This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or an opinion on any issue. Blakes would be pleased to provide additional details or advice about specific situations if desired. For permission to reprint articles, please contact the Blakes Marketing Department at .
Key Clauses in Construction Contracts: Practical Guidance for Project Success | JD Supra
As the legal and commercial landscape around construction projects continues to evolve, so must the contracts that govern these projects. In recent years, courts and contracting parties have emphasized how agreements allocate risk and define procedural obligations. Careful drafting and informed negotiation of the following five areas can reduce the risk of contract disputes in construction agreements. Force Majeure and Supervening Events Clauses.
Key Clauses In Construction Contracts: Practical Guidance For Project Success
BC Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP More Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) is one of Canada's top business law firms, serving a diverse national and international client base. Our integrated office network provides clients with access to the Firm's full spectrum of capabilities in virtually every area of business law. As the legal and commercial landscape around construction projects continues to evolve, so must the contracts that govern these projects.
Key Clauses in Construction Contracts: Practical Guidance for Project Success | Blakes
As the legal and commercial landscape around construction projects continues to evolve, so must the contracts that govern these projects. In recent years, courts and contracting parties have emphasized how agreements allocate risk and define procedural obligations. Careful drafting and informed negotiation of the following five areas can reduce the risk of contract disputes in construction agreements. Force Majeure and Supervening Events Clauses.
Ontario Court Of Appeal Confirms Crypto Company's Arbitration Agreement Void
In a recent decision in Lochan v. Binance Holdings Limited, the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) affirmed the decision of the lower court setting aside an arbitration agreement as void both because it was contrary to public policy and unconscionable. The lower court decision was previously discussed in our February 2024 Blakes Bulletin: Ontario Court Rejects Crypto Arbitration Agreement as Unenforceable.
Arbitrage : Tendances récentes dans les secteurs des grands projets et de l’infrastructure
Comme les projets d’infrastructure sont de plus en plus complexes, les intervenants cherchent des solutions novatrices pour atténuer les risques et gérer les différends plus efficacement. Dans le texte qui suit, nous faisons un survol des tendances récentes en matière d’arbitrage observées dans les secteurs des grands projets et de l’infrastructure au Canada.
Unpacking Recent Trends In Major Projects And Infrastructure Arbitration
Amid the evolving complexities of infrastructure projects, stakeholders are increasingly seeking innovative solutions to mitigate risk and manage disputes more efficiently. Below, we discuss recent trends shaping major projects and infrastructure arbitration in Canada and highlight key considerations and emerging strategies for proactive engagement. Arbitration Precedents. In three recent cases, Orica Canada Inc. v. Arvos GmbH, IBI Group Architects v.
Unpacking Recent Trends in Major Projects and Infrastructure Arbitration
Amid the evolving complexities of infrastructure projects, stakeholders are increasingly seeking innovative solutions to mitigate risk and manage disputes more efficiently. Below, we discuss recent trends shaping major projects and infrastructure arbitration in Canada and highlight key considerations and emerging strategies for proactive engagement. Arbitration Precedents. In three recent cases, Orica Canada Inc. v. Arvos GmbH, IBI Group Architects v.
Unpacking Recent Trends in Major Projects and Infrastructure Arbitration | Blakes
Amid the evolving complexities of infrastructure projects, stakeholders are increasingly seeking innovative solutions to mitigate risk and manage disputes more efficiently. Below, we discuss recent trends shaping major projects and infrastructure arbitration in Canada and highlight key considerations and emerging strategies for proactive engagement. Arbitration Precedents. In three recent cases, Orica Canada Inc. v. Arvos GmbH, IBI Group Architects v.
Ontario : Une cour refuse d’annuler une sentence arbitrale malgré des craintes raisonnables de partialité d’un des arbitres | JD Supra
[co-author: Danielle Landry, étudiante en droit] Dans l’affaire Vento Motorcycles, Inc. v United Mexican States, la Cour supérieure de justice de l’Ontario (la « Cour ») a rejeté une demande d’annulation de sentence arbitrale (la « sentence ») rendue par un tribunal composé de trois arbitres. Cette demande était fondée sur un manquement à l’équité procédurale et des craintes raisonnables de partialité établis à l’égard de l’un des arbitres.
Ontario Court Declines To Set Aside Arbitral Award Despite Reasonable Apprehension Of Arbitrator's Bias
In Vento Motorcycles, Inc. v. United Mexican States, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Court) rejected an application to set aside an arbitral award (the Award), which a three-arbitrator Tribunal issued, on the basis of procedural unfairness and reasonable apprehension of bias established on the part of one arbitrator.
Ontario Court Declines to Set Aside Arbitral Award Despite Reasonable Apprehension of Arbitrator’s Bias | JD Supra
[co-author: Danielle Landry, Student] In Vento Motorcycles, Inc. v. United Mexican States, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Court) rejected an application to set aside an arbitral award (the Award), which a three-arbitrator Tribunal issued, on the basis of procedural unfairness and reasonable apprehension of bias established on the part of one arbitrator.
Ontario Court Declines to Set Aside Arbitral Award Despite Reasonable Apprehension of Arbitrator’s B | Blakes
In Vento Motorcycles, Inc. v. United Mexican States, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Court) rejected an application to set aside an arbitral award (the Award), which a three-arbitrator Tribunal issued, on the basis of procedural unfairness and reasonable apprehension of bias established on the part of one arbitrator.
La Cour suprême du Canada clarifie l’application des clauses d’arbitrage en matière d’insolvabilité | JD Supra
Dans le cadre de sa récente décision Peace River Hydro Partners c. Petrowest Corp., 2022 CSC 41 (l’« affaire Peace River »), la Cour suprême du Canada (la « CSC ») a précisé les circonstances dans lesquelles une convention d’arbitrage par ailleurs valide peut être déclarée inopérante dans le contexte d’une procédure de mise sous séquestre ordonnée par le tribunal en vertu de la Loi sur la faillite et l’insolvabilité, L.R.C., 1985, ch. B-3 (la « LFI »).
Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies Application of Arbitration Clauses in Insolvency | JD Supra
In the recent case of Peace River Hydro Partners v. Petrowest Corp., 2022 SCC 41 (Peace River), the Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC) clarified the circumstances in which an otherwise valid arbitration agreement may be held to be inoperative in the context of a court-ordered receivership under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. B-3 (the BIA).
Winner Takes All: B.C. Court Confirms Indemnification Costs As The Normal Rule In Commercial Arbitrations
Canada: Winner Takes All: B.C. Court Confirms Indemnification Costs As The Normal Rule In Commercial Arbitrations 08 February 2021 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Your LinkedIn Connections with the authors To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. In domestic and international commercial arbitrations, it is common for successful parties to be awarded their actual reasonable legal fees and disbursements.
Winner Takes All: B.C. Court Confirms Indemnification Costs as the Normal Rule in Commercial Arbitrations | JD Supra
In domestic and international commercial arbitrations, it is common for successful parties to be awarded their actual reasonable legal fees and disbursements. The legislation governing domestic commercial arbitrations in British Columbia permits arbitrators to exercise their discretion to award such costs. The Supreme Court of British Columbia discussed the law applicable to indemnification cost awards in its recent decision in Allard v. The University of British Columbia.
Arbitrages commerciaux : la Cour suprême de la C.-B. confirme que la partie gagnante a droit au remboursement de ses frais et honoraires d’avocat | JD Supra
Dans le cadre d’arbitrages commerciaux internationaux, il arrive couramment que la partie gagnante se voie accorder les frais et honoraires d’avocat raisonnables qu’elle a réellement encourus pour plaider l’affaire. La loi relative à l’arbitrage commercial de la Colombie-Britannique confère aux arbitres un pouvoir discrétionnaire leur permettant d’adjuger les frais à la charge d’une partie. Dans sa récente décision dans l’affaire Allard v.
Winner Takes All: B.C. Court Confirms Indemnification Costs As The Normal Rule In Commercial Arbitrations - Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration - Canada
Canada: Winner Takes All: B.C. Court Confirms Indemnification Costs As The Normal Rule In Commercial Arbitrations 04 February 2021 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Your LinkedIn Connections with the authors To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. In domestic and international commercial arbitrations, it is common for successful parties to be awarded their actual reasonable legal fees and disbursements.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Ariel
Contact Ariel, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack