Skip To Main Content
Ben Dziekan on Muck Rack

Ben Dziekan

As seen in: Lexology, Mondaq
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile
Back to Ben Dziekan’s profile

Articles by Ben Dziekan

Pixels and pawns: navigating accessibility and IP rights management in tabletop emulator platforms

|
By Lauren Eade, Stuart Green Verified, Ben Dziekan
| Lexology Verified
Tabletop emulators are a popular platform for board game enthusiasts. They allow users to recreate the experience of playing physical board games with others online, fostering a vibrant community of gamers. However, this convenience comes with intellectual property (IP) considerations that both board game publishers, tabletop emulator developers and users must navigate.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Australian Designs: Reading Between The (Broken) Lines

|
By William R. Sidebottom, Ben Dziekan, Justin Negler
| Mondaq
In Wynnes Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys Pty Ltd v Wamlez Pty Ltd [2023] ADO 3, the Australian Designs Office considered a third-party request to be heard in respect of the validity of certified design number 201712220 (the Design).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Australian Designs: Reading Between the (Broken) Lines

|
By William R. Sidebottom, Ben Dziekan, Justin Negler
| Lexology Verified
Introduction In Wynnes Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys Pty Ltd v Wamlez Pty Ltd [2023] ADO 3, the Australian Designs Office considered a third-party request to be heard in respect of the validity of certified design number 201712220 (the Design).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

TCT Vs Polaris - Patent - Australia

|
By Justin Negler, Ben Dziekan
| Mondaq
Recent Australian Federal Court decision TCT Group Pty Ltd v Polaris IP Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1493 is particularly notable for its exploration of support in an external document – namely an earlier filed patent application. The decision provides a cautionary tale to patent applicants and legal practitioners alike, addressing essential considerations for both sufficiency and support requirements under Australian patent law, and interparty communications with an alleged infringer.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
Show More