Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Benjamin Cassady
GDPR, BDSG, & Discovery In U.S. Courts Under Hague Evidence Convention
United States: GDPR, BDSG, & Discovery In U.S. Courts Under Hague Evidence Convention 28 October 2021 by Lionel M. Lavenue , Benjamin Cassady and Michael Aragon Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Your LinkedIn Connections with the authors To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Lacking Control: Why Subsidiaries (Mostly) Can't Produce A Parent's Information
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. Take enough visits to a school playground and eventually you will see two kids get into a fight. Maybe it is over something said, or maybe it is over the good basketball, or maybe it is a bully trying to steal another kid's lunch money. But what if it was a bully trying to use the other kid to steal from their parents' bank account? Could that bully really expect the kid to be able to access their parents' accounts?
Trends In Attorney Fees And Sanctions Decisions In 2020 Q4
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. Finnegan attorneys Lionel Lavenue, Benjamin Cassady, Robert Fernandes, and Kayvon Ghayoumi explain the reasons behind the current direction of attorney fee awards in patent cases. The Supreme Court's 2014 Octane Fitness decision1 lowered the bar for awarding attorney fees under Section 285 of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C.A. § 285.
"Found" Wherever We've Stayed: Interpreting The "Found" Requirement Of 28 U.S.C. § 1782
United States: "Found" Wherever We've Stayed: Interpreting The "Found" Requirement Of 28 U.S.C. § 1782 23 February 2021 by Lionel M. Lavenue , Benjamin Cassady and Joseph Myles Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Your LinkedIn Connections with the authors To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
When Personal Emails Become Discoverable
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. Parties who have been through discovery know that litigants often hotly dispute the bounds of what is discoverable. Many parties are extremely sensitive about discovery veering into areas that may lead to the collection of personal information from their employees, opening up the possibility that any of that information, such as personal emails, may be produced.
The History And Purpose Of Section 1782: Will Courts Permit Discovery Into Documents Located Abroad?
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice): Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below. Mondaq has a "free to view" business model.
To Fee Or Not To Fee
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. In Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Almirall, LLC, the Federal Circuit determined that it cannot award attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 for work done on an underlying inter partes review (IPR).1 However, it also provided welcome guidance suggesting that district courts can, in limited circumstances, invoke § 285 to award attorneys' fees for parallel Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings.
Beating
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice): Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below. Mondaq has a "free to view" business model.
Evolving Case Law Elucidates Atty Fees For Patent Litigants
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. Title 35 of the U.S. Code, Section 285, in its entirety, states that "[t]he court in exceptional [patent] cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party." This means that if a party prevails in an "exceptional" case, the court may award it upwards of millions of dollars in attorney fees.
Using Multiple-Attorney Depositions After Finjan Ruling
Law360 (November 18, 2019, 4:53 PM EST) -- Depositions are powerful tools for obtaining sworn out-of-court testimony for use at trial and throughout a case. Depositions are a unique part of the discovery process in that they allow attorneys to examine adverse or third-party witnesses without direct judicial supervision. The federal rules do not specify the number of attorneys who may question a witness.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Benjamin
Contact Benjamin, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack