Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Bianca DiBella
US Supreme Court to Hear Nvidia Crypto Mining Case on Securities Pleading Standard | JD Supra
On June 17, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Nvidia Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB,[1] agreeing to hear Nvidia’s appeal of a Ninth Circuit ruling that revived shareholders’ fraud claims regarding Nvidia’s cryptocurrency mining sales. This gives the Court a chance to resolve two circuit splits on the pleading requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA).
US Supreme Court Limits Scope of Omission Liability for Section 10(b) Securities Fraud Claims | JD Supra
On April 12, in a long-awaited and pivotal decision, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that private plaintiffs may not plead a federal securities fraud claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) based solely on a company's failure to disclose a known trend or uncertainty required to be disclosed under Item 303 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-K.
Unanimous Supreme Court Sharply Limits Liability under Section 11 for Companies Issuing Securities Through Direct Listings | JD Supra
In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Slack Technologies v. Pirani, No. 22-200, 2023 WL 3742580, 598 U.S. __ ( June 1, 2023) that a claim under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 is not viable unless a plaintiff is able to prove that the shares purchased were among the shares formally registered through the company's registration statement. In so holding, the Court vacated the Ninth Circuit's decision in Pirani v. Slack Technologies, 13 F.4th 940 (9th Cir.
Divided Ninth Circ. Opens Floodgates for Direct Listing Investors to Assert Section 11 Claim | The Legal Intelligencer
In a matter of first impression, a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit panel in Pirani v. Slack Technologies, 13 F.4th 940 (9th Cir.
A New Wave Of Board Diversity Derivative Litigation
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. With a hot national spotlight on issues of racial diversity, equality, and inclusion, the composition of corporate boards of directors is facing increased scrutiny from the American public, legislators and the plaintiffs' bar.
A New Wave of Board Diversity Derivative Litigation | JD Supra
With a hot national spotlight on issues of racial diversity, equality, and inclusion, the composition of corporate boards of directors is facing increased scrutiny from the American public, legislators and the plaintiffs’ bar.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Bianca
Contact Bianca, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack