Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
In the latest issue of the Intellectual Property Cases Annual Report (2018) by Supreme People's Court (“SPC”), the case between Qualcomm and Apple, represented by the author, was selected as one of the representative cases. SPC used this case to give guidance to the review criteria for jurisdictional dispute involving joint infringement.
Asia-Pacific, China August 12 2019 在2019年最新发布的《最高人民法院知识产权案件年度报告（2018）》中，笔者代理的针对高通公司与苹果公司之间诉讼的（2018)最高法民辖终77号裁定（77、78和79号三份裁定涉及完全相同的问题，报告中仅列举了77号裁定）被选为典型案例。最高院借此案件对涉及共同侵权的管辖权异议案件的审查标准，作出了具有指导意义的裁判指引。 简言之，最高院认为，在管辖权异议阶段，原则上只需审理与建立案件管辖连接点相关的事实。如果与建立管辖连接点相关的事实同时涉及案件实体争议内容的，只需审查案件初步证据是否能够证成一个可争辩的管辖连接点事实即可，一般不对案件实体争议内容作出明确认定。 所涉案件的具体事实和裁判要点如下：...
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
