Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Brian E. Casey
Premiums Paid Offset Awarded to Investor in Florida Estate Recovery Case
In an important decision issued in April 2024, the Florida Fifth Judicial Circuit Court, applying Delaware law, granted summary judgement to Viva Capital 3, L.P. awarding it the right to offset the amount of insurance premiums it had paid for a $10m life insurance policy issued in 2006, which Viva had purchased in a tertiary life settlement policy purchase transaction, against the death benefit to which the insured’s estate was entitled to recover from Viva under Delaware’s insurable interest...
NCAA Argues Proposed Class Too Diverse In Race Bias Suit
BARNES & THORNBURG EMAIL DISCLAIMER Before sending mail to your intended recipient, you must first understand the implications of communicating with Barnes & Thornburg LLP and agree to the following terms. Barnes & Thornburg LLP appreciates your visit to the firm’s web site. Our site is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.
The Biden Administration Proposes Changes to the Taxation of Cryptocurrency Transactions
Legal Disclaimer You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only.
April 2022 Crypto Enforcement Actions And Regulatory Guidance Roundup
In April, we continued to see a steady pace in the seriousness and frequency of crypto enforcement actions by state and federal law enforcement.
Abnormal breathing recognition for law enforcement
In the struggle to physically control a person, officers must not erroneously mistake unconsciousness for compliance In my previous article, I described how ventilation and respiration work together to accomplish what we commonly think of as breathing.
How I wrote a blog in under 24 hours (Content Lab, Ep. 45)
April 24th, 2020 min read Normally, we dedicate episodes of Content Lab to a broad topic or lesson about how the content sausage gets made in the digital sales and marketing world. This week, however, we're doing something a little bit different. We're going to take a fully dissect "how a bill became a law" (so to speak) with a specific piece of content, so we can share with you our favorite tips, tricks, and personal processes and philosophies of content creation.
I can’t breathe: What it means for law enforcement
When a subject tells you they can’t breathe, it should be understood as a nontrivial indication that something might be seriously wrong. By Brian Casey Breathing is somewhat complex and, in some ways, counterintuitive. The skills needed to assess and treat breathing problems are therefore generally beyond what an officer would typically be taught or expected to understand. To do so would require additional focused training on the anatomy and physiology of the respiratory system.
3 major reasons why Arsenal should sell Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang!
Premier League - Arsenal v Newcastle United - Emirates Stadium, London, Britain - February 16, 2020 Arsenal's Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang in action. [REUTERS/Eddie Keogh] The writer of this article is an ardent Arsenal fan! Arsenal are on the brink of facing Portsmouth in the FA Cup just days after their shocking loss to Olympiacos on Thursday in the Europa League knockout match at the Emirates Stadium.
25 Top Inbound Marketing Blogs to Follow in 2019
July 9th, 2019 min read Top Inbound Marketing Blogs HubSpot Ann Handley DigitalMarketer The PR 20/20 Blog Kuno Creative Lynton Moz Weidert Group Danny Brown Trust Insights Chris Brogan Problogger Top Rank Marketing Jeff Bullas Seth Godin Daily Blog Tips ClickZ Orbit Media Studios John Chow Web Ink Now CopyBlogger Duct Tape Marketing Search Engine Journal Social Media Examiner Outside the Jar (HotJar) Since IMPACT's founding 10 years ago, we as a company have invested tremendous time and...
Antitrust Standing – Is There An App for That?
In the next few months, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Apple Inc. v. Pepper (In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litig.), a potentially significant “application” of antitrust law to e-commerce. At stake is the almost $11.5 billion in revenue the App Store now earns Apple annually (not to mention what other types of app stores generate these days).
Well, That Didn’t Take Long – and With No Fanfare, Decades of Administrative Law Are Upended
Perhaps the administration had this one in the can already. On Tuesday, less than three weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court decided Lucia, President Trump signed an executive order essentially applying the Supreme Court’s rationale in Lucia to the hiring of all administrative law judges (ALJs) in the federal government.
Supreme Court Decides Lucia – But the Saga Continues
After almost two years (and six blog posts), we have reached the conclusion of the SEC v. Lucia saga. Except we haven’t. The U.S. Supreme Court decided Lucia on June 21, 2018. However, just as Marvel movies now are simply prequels to the next action movie, the fractured collection of opinions in Lucia is simply a cliffhanger that sets the stage for sequel cases in future Terms.
U.S. Supreme Court Limits Potential for Repeat Class Actions
In a unanimous opinion handed down this week, the U.S. Supreme Court provided needed protection against the specter of successive class action lawsuits. In China Agritech v. Resh, the court held that the mere filing of a case labeled as a class action does not “toll” or pause the statute of limitations for future class actions addressing the same claims.
U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Colorado Baker, Leaves Unresolved Issues of Refusing to Serve Same-Sex Couples
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 4 in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The 7-to-2 decision was based on very narrow grounds and left unresolved whether business owners have a First Amendment right to refuse to sell goods and services to same-sex couples. The case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, LTD., et al. v.
Lucia Oral Argument Highlights Philisophical Tensions
The Supreme Court heard oral argument Monday in Lucia v. SEC. And while it was not the “cage match” that some hoped for, it did raise important questions. Both the parties’ arguments and the Justices’ questions indicated that the Court has several conflicting issues to resolve in deciding whether SEC ALJs are hired in violation of the Appointments Clause.
Could the Supreme Court's Lucia Argument Become A Cage Match?
On April 23, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear what may be one of the most impactful cases for the Securities and Exchange Commission, and perhaps other federal administrative agencies, in a long time. In Lucia v. SEC, the Supreme Court will hear arguments – including from the U.S. Solicitor General – that the way that the SEC’s administrative law judges (ALJs) are appointed violates the U.S. Constitution’s Appointments Clause.
SEC Appointments Clause Dilemma
On January 12, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in SEC v. Lucia, which will decide whether the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) administrative law judges (ALJs) are appointed consistently with the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. Unfortunately for the SEC, at least right now, no one is arguing that the SEC’s process is constitutional. What the Court does in this case will potentially upend not only the SEC’s ALJ process but other agencies’ as well.
The SEC’s Appointments Clause Dilemma
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has an Appointments Clause problem. Actually, it has two.
U.S. Supreme Court Decides Salman, Reaffirms Broader View of Insider Trading
Just like that, the Newman/Salman insider trading saga has come to a close. For now, at least. These cases have generated a good bit of ink on this blog. Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously decided United States v. Salman, affirming Salman’s conviction for insider trading, just two months after oral argument. The opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, was not much of a surprise in what it decided, but was somewhat more interesting in what it did not address.
U.S. Supreme Court Decides Salman, Reaffirms Broader View of Insider Trading
Just like that, the Newman/Salman insider trading saga has come to a close. For now, at least. These cases have generated a good bit of ink on this blog. Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously decided United States v. Salman, affirming Salman’s conviction for insider trading, just two months after oral argument. The opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, was not much of a surprise in what it decided, but was somewhat more interesting in what it did not address.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Brian E.
Contact Brian E., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack