Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
The US Supreme Court agreed to hear South Dakota’s challenge to Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, setting the Court up to decide whether a retailer with no physical presence in a state is required to collect and remit sales and use tax. In agreeing on January 12, 2018, to hear South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.,[1] South Dakota’s challenge to the US Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Quill Corp. v.
New provisions will have a significant impact on secondary sales of fund interests and partnership M&A transactions. On December 22, 2017, US President Donald Trump signed into law the sweeping tax reform bill H.R. 1 (the Act). Included in the new legislation is a provision that reverses the Grecian Magnesite Mining decision by the US Tax Court[1] and introduces a new 10% withholding tax on the sale of certain partnership interests.
Federal tax reform will have a significant and possibly unexpected impact on state taxes, including on individual deductions and, for corporations, reporting methods and limitations regarding net operating losses and interest expense. On December 22, 2017, US President Donald Trump made tax reform official, inking his signature to HR 1, the 2017 tax legislation formerly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act).
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
