Skip To Main Content
Edward Fanning on Muck Rack

Edward Fanning

Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile
Back to Edward Fanning’s profile

Articles by Edward Fanning

NJ Supreme Court Issues Another Landmark Decision In In Re Accutane, This Time Regarding Choice-Of-Law And The Presumption Of Adequacy For FDA-Approved Warnings | McCarter & English, LLP - JDSupra

|
By Edward Fanning, David Kott, Natalie H. Mantell
| JD Supra
JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations. This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services").
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

McCarter Plays Key Role In New Jersey Supreme Court’s Landmark In Re: Accutane Decision Regarding Expert Admissibility Standards | JD Supra

|
By Edward Fanning, David Kott, Steven Del Mauro
| JD Supra
JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations. This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services").
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Spade/Wegner: Supreme Court Delivers Crushing Blow To TCCWNA Plaintiffs By Enforcing “Aggrieved Consumer” Requirement As Written | JD Supra

|
By Edward Fanning, Gregory Horowitz, David Kott
| JD Supra
Late last year, McCarter reported on the New Jersey Supreme Court’s ruling in Dugan/Bozzi and predicted that the Supreme Court would soon hold that consumers filing suit under New Jersey’s Truth-in-Consumer Contract Warranty and Notice Act (TCCWNA) must suffer some adverse consequence in order to recover the statutorily prescribed $100 penalty. (Dugan/Bozzi Alert.) Today, that prediction came true in Spade v.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

New Jersey Supreme Court Grants Leave For Oral Argument On Behalf Of Amici Curiae Trade Associations In Multicounty Litigation In Re: Accutane

|
By Edward Fanning, David Kott
| JD Supra
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Already signed up? Log in here By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Dugan/Bozzi: The New Jersey Supreme Court Provides Shelter From The TCCWNA Storm

|
By David Kott, Edward Fanning, Gregory Horowitz
| JD Supra
Last year, McCarter was the first law firm to warn of the perfect storm resulting from the organized plaintiffs’ bar’s vague and unconstrained interpretation of the Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act (“TCCWNA” or “the Act”). (See “If You Sell Online, Your Fine Print May Put You At Risk: Wave of Lawsuits Targets Website Terms and Conditions Under the New Jersey Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act”).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
Show More