Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Emily A. Denisco
When IP Enforcement Becomes the Story: Trade Dress, Antitrust, and Fee-Shifting After Deckers v. Quince | JD Supra
Aggressive IP enforcement can be a powerful tool for protecting product designs, brand equity, and market position. But the related proceedings between Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Last Brand, Inc., d/b/a Quince, show the other side of that strategy: when enforcement becomes sufficiently broad, repetitive, or unsuccessful, the enforcement campaign itself may become the subject of litigation. Following the jury verdict in Deckers Outdoor Corp. v.
When IP Enforcement Becomes the Story: Trade Dress, Antitrust, and Fee-Shifting After Deckers v. Quince
We've updated our Privacy Statement. Before you continue, please read our new Privacy Statement and familiarize yourself with the terms.
When IP Enforcement Becomes the Story: Trade Dress, Antitrust, and Fee-Shifting After Deckers v. Quince
We've updated our Privacy Statement. Before you continue, please read our new Privacy Statement and familiarize yourself with the terms.
When IP Enforcement Becomes the Story: Trade Dress, Antitrust, and Fee-Shifting After Deckers v. Quince
We've updated our Privacy Statement. Before you continue, please read our new Privacy Statement and familiarize yourself with the terms.
When IP Enforcement Becomes the Story: Trade Dress, Antitrust, and Fee-Shifting After Deckers v. Quince
We've updated our Privacy Statement. Before you continue, please read our new Privacy Statement and familiarize yourself with the terms.
When IP Enforcement Becomes the Story: Trade Dress, Antitrust, and Fee-Shifting After Deckers v. Quince
We've updated our Privacy Statement. Before you continue, please read our new Privacy Statement and familiarize yourself with the terms.
When IP Enforcement Becomes the Story: Trade Dress, Antitrust, and Fee-Shifting After Deckers v. Quince
We've updated our Privacy Statement. Before you continue, please read our new Privacy Statement and familiarize yourself with the terms.
Design Patents in the Real World: Lessons from Deckers’ UGG® Design Patent
On the surface, design patents often look straightforward: a handful of drawings, one claim, and a short specification (description). But the recent path of Deckers Outdoor Corporation’s U.S. Design Patent No. D927,161 (161 Patent) shows how deceptively complex design-patent enforcement can become once a patent moves from prosecution to PTAB challenge to jury trial. The ’161 Patent survived an inter partes review (IPR) challenge at the institution stage.
Designs on Trial: Comparing U.S. and EU Design Protections Post-LKQ
The landscape of design protection has seen significant developments on both sides of the Atlantic, with the U.S. undergoing a pivotal shift in design patent law following the Federal Circuit’s decision in LKQ Corporation v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC, No. 2021-2348 (Fed. Cir. May 21, 2024), while the European Union continues to operate under the established framework for Community Registered Designs (CRDs).
Designs on Trial: Comparing U.S. and EU Design Protections Post-LKQ | JD Supra
The landscape of design protection has seen significant developments on both sides of the Atlantic, with the U.S. undergoing a pivotal shift in design patent law following the Federal Circuit’s decision in LKQ Corporation v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC, No. 2021-2348 (Fed. Cir. May 21, 2024), while the European Union continues to operate under the established framework for Community Registered Designs (CRDs).
Navigating Final Rejections In Patent Prosecution: AFCP 2.0 Vs. 37 CFR § 1.116
Final rejections are inevitable in patent prosecution, often requiring patent practitioners and applicants to carefully consider their next steps. While a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) is a common option, it is not always the most cost-effective, especially when a response can be submitted within the shortened two-month statutory window.
The Implications Of The Copyright Small Claims Court
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences) Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaqs use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice): To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Emily A.
Contact Emily A., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack