Skip To Main Content
Emily Greig on Muck Rack

Emily Greig

As seen in: Lexology, Mondaq, Regulation Tomorrow
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile
Back to Emily Greig’s profile

Articles by Emily Greig

Leveling The Playing Field: An Overview Of The New SCCA Arbitration Rules In The Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia (KSA)

|
By Mohammed Altammami, Aarti Thadani, Emily Greig
| Mondaq
Those who operate in the Middle East may have experience with the Dubai International Arbitration Centre's (DIAC) new Arbitration Rules which were introduced in 2022 following the abolition of the DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre. Just over a year later, the Saudi Centre for Commercial Arbitration (SCCA) has also announced the publication of its own revised rules which came into effect on, and apply to all arbitrations filed on or after, 1 May, 2023 (the SCCA Rules).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Be warned - you can be held liable for the defamatory comments of another! | Lexology

|
By Emily Greig, Kingsley Napley, Sian Akerman
| Lexology Verified
United Kingdom February 21 2019 In the recent High Court judgment of Monir v Wood [2018], the Court held the Defendant liable for a defamatory tweet, even though he did not post or have knowledge of the tweet at the time. The Defendant was also held liable for failing to remove the defamatory material once it was brought to his attention. Facts of the case Mr Wood was the Chairman of the Bristol UKIP branch.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Incorrect information or advice: to what extent will a professional be held liable? | Lexology

|
By Jemma Brimblecombe, Emily Greig, Kingsley Napley
| Lexology Verified
United Kingdom February 11 2019 The recent Court of Appeal judgment in Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2019] re-enforces that the correct approach in professional negligence cases is to distinguish between ‘information’ and ‘advice’ cases when considering the extent to which a professional may be liable.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

SAAMCO reinforced: Clients may bear the weight of their own commercial misjudgements

|
By Kingsley Napley, Jemma Brimblecombe, Emily Greig
| Lexology Verified
The SAAMCO principle, derived from the case of South Australia Asset Management Corp v York Montague Ltd [1997], established that for loss to be attributable to a professional’s breach of duty (and therefore recoverable), the loss must come within the scope of the duty of care owed. The principle affirms that a professional will not be liable for all or part of a loss that arises from risks which are not within his duty to protect the client against.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
Show More