Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Data and metadata made available within the Environmental Data Institute (EDI) repository: https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/8b3340793bad75ffa4b734bc68552f3b (Schroeder et al., 2026).
1 Introduction Electrical weed control, recently reviewed by Slaven et al. (2023), has become a viable option for weed management in some agricultural settings. Weed electrocution offers many advantages, including no negative physical soil impacts, no off-target impacts to adjacent plants (Borger and Slaven 2024), no issues with chemical applications such as residues, drift, or the need for a rainfast or pre-harvest period after application (Slaven et al.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Supporting Information Filename Description wre70002-sup-0001-Supplemental_Tables.docxWord 2007 document , 33 KB Table S1. Examples of chemical reactions in soil that decrease or increase soil pH. Table S2..
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
