Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
janeschicken said: Come ON.. look at the fighters on Hopkins' resume, and don't give me that "blown up welter" ****. Most didn't give him a chance in hell against Trinidad. He also gave a prime Roy Jones a highly competitive fight, has never looked bad against anyone in the last 15 years or so, and only lost in close battles with Taylor. Click to expand... least hopkins didn't get away with it against guys like dave tiberi. :yep toney was lucky to get decisions even if his middleweight prime.
Charles wins better boxer, technically better, faster, better combinations/fluidity, movement and defense. Workrate/stamina/power are close calls, Langford may have had the better. So Charles is going to outbox Langford but Sam would have his moments. Given are both approx the same size in their prime Charles is P4P better. Legacy wise is a close call, Charles competed in a better era against better opponents so I like him legacy wise over Langford too.
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
