Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Frank Kuhn
When the world's at stake, go beyond the headlines.
In his long-awaited nuclear deterrence speech, French President Emmanuel Macron laid out his new doctrine of “forward deterrence” (dissuasion avancée) and — for the first time in history — offered to deploy the French Strategic Air Forces to European countries.
Bedrohung durch Atomwaffen: Was die nächste Bundesregierung tun muss
zum Hauptinhalt © dpa/Sergei Ilnitsky Ein weltweiter Verzicht auf einen atomaren Erstschlag ist sinnvoll, um das Risiko nuklearer Kriege einzudämmen. Doch angesichts der Weltlage könnte solch ein Ansinnen Chinas Aufrüstung helfen. Ein Gastbeitrag von Frank Kuhn Rafael Loss Heute, 10:59 Uhr Russlands Vollinvasion der Ukraine und die nuklearen Drohungen des russischen Präsidenten Wladimir Putin gegen den Westen haben die Gefahr eines Nuklearwaffeneinsatzes ins öffentliche Bewusstsein gerückt.
Bedrohung durch Atomwaffen: Was die nächste Bundesregierung tun muss
© dpa/Sergei Ilnitsky Ein weltweiter Verzicht auf einen atomaren Erstschlag, für den sich etwa die SPD einsetzt, ist sinnvoll, um das Risiko nuklearer Kriege einzudämmen. Doch angesichts der Weltlage könnte solch ein Ansinnen die Nato spalten und Chinas Aufrüstung helfen.
No Quick Solutions: A Different Approach to Hypersonic Arms Control
The hypersonic arms race is in full swing: Countries around the world are investing staggering amounts of money into hypersonic weapons. And these are no longer limited to Russia, China, and the United States. The United Kingdom launched its own hypersonic initiative in 2023, while the Japanese defense ministry requested about 80 billion yen ($547 million) for the development and production of hypersonic weapons in fiscal year 2024.
Making Nuclear Sharing Credible Again: What the F-35A Means for NATO - War on the Rocks
Critics and supporters of NATO’s nuclear deterrence posture, which relies partly on forward-deployed U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe, hardly agree on anything. But when it comes to nuclear sharing, their assessments are remarkably similar. Both groups claim, either explicitly or implicitly, that American B-61 gravity bombs and the nuclear sharing arrangement as a whole are militarily obsolete and lack credibility.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Frank
Contact Frank, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack