Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by George Summerfield
Reviewing the Reviewers: Loper Bright's Impact on Judicial Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board IPR Practice
Recommended Citation Jason A. Engel, George C. Summerfield & Devon C. Beane, Reviewing the Reviewers: Loper Bright's Impact on Judicial Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board IPR Practice, 24 Chi.-Kent J. Intell. Prop. 1 (2025). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/ckjip/vol24/iss1/4 DOWNLOADS Since February 20, 2025 COinS
AI Horizons: Understanding AI's Legal Impact Across Industries Webinar Series
Watch Now On 17 October, the firm hosted the webinar, AI Horizons: Understanding AI's Legal Impact Across Industries. Panel members addressed the potential impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across the globe exploring how AI technologies are transforming companies across all industries and the multifaceted legal issues they encounter due to AI implementation.
New USPTO Guidelines On AI-Assisted Inventions Leave Many Questions Unanswered
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued what it labeled as Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions [Docket No. PTO-P-2023-0043].1 Despite its name, the document provides little in the way of certainty that one could not garner from reviewing recent precedent addressing the issue of artificial intelligence (AI) inventions.
New USPTO Guidelines on AI-Assisted Inventions Leave Many Questions Unanswered | JD Supra
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued what it labeled as Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions [Docket No. PTO-P-2023-0043].1 Despite its name, the document provides little in the way of certainty that one could not garner from reviewing recent precedent addressing the issue of artificial intelligence (AI) inventions.
New USPTO Guidelines On AI-Assisted Inventions Leave Many Questions Unanswered
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued what it labeled as Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions [Docket No. PTO-P-2023-0043].1 Despite its name, the document provides little in the way of certainty that one could not garner from reviewing recent precedent addressing the issue of artificial intelligence (AI) inventions.
New USPTO Guidelines on AI-Assisted Inventions Leave Many Questions Unanswered
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued what it labeled as Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions [Docket No. PTO-P-2023-0043].1 Despite its name, the document provides little in the way of certainty that one could not garner from reviewing recent precedent addressing the issue of artificial intelligence (AI) inventions.
If San Francisco Is Not Your Final Destination... | JD Supra
For more than two decades, the Federal Circuit has held that correspondence alone from a patentee to a possible infringer would not subject it to personal jurisdiction in any declaratory-judgment action the alleged infringer might file in its “home” jurisdiction.1 In Trimble, Inc. v. PerDiemCo LLC,2 the Federal Circuit seems to have changed course. In Trimble, over the course of several months, the patentee communicated with the alleged infringer at least 22 times by letter, email, and telephone.
Patent Holders to Watch Personal Jurisdiction per Federal Circuit
Wednesday, May 26, 2021 For more than two decades, the Federal Circuit has held that correspondence alone from a patentee to a possible infringer would not subject it to personal jurisdiction in any declaratory-judgment action the alleged infringer might file in its “home” jurisdiction.1 In Trimble, Inc. v. PerDiemCo LLC,2 the Federal Circuit seems to have changed course.
Five New Products from China Added to Forced Labor List | JD Supra
The use of forced labor in the Xinjiang province of the People’s Republic of China continues to receive public scrutiny as more than one million Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities have been arbitrarily detained in reeducation camps in the region, and approximately 100,000 former detainees and rural poor are believed to have been forced to manufacture certain products.
Ready, Fire, Aim – Picking the Correct Vehicle for Constitutional Challenges to Administrative Agency Decisions | JD Supra
An administrative agency lacks jurisdiction to decide a constitutional challenge that asks it to act contrary to its statutory provisions. See, e.g., Riggin v. Off. of Senate Fair Emp. Pracs., 61 F.3d 1563, 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1995). The question then is: when and where should a party raise such a constitutional challenge? The Federal Circuit recently answered this question in Security People, Inc. v. Iancu, 971 F.3d 1355, 1360–61 (Fed. Cir.
Ready, Fire, Aim - Picking the Correct Vehicle for Constitutional Challenges to Administrative Agency Decisions
September 30, 2020 Chancery Court Clarifies MFW Protections Must Be Implemented Prior To... by: David L. Forney and Claire H. Suni Statutory – not Shareholder – Activism: Governor Newsom Signs... by: Jennifer B. Rubin Court Affirmed Summary Judgment For Successor Trustees Due To A... by: David Fowler Johnson U.S House of Representatives Demonstrates Support for Fusion Energy by: Tim L. Peckinpaugh and Michael L. O'Neill OFCCP Opens Hotline for Complaints of Race and Sex Stereotyping in...
Like a Hawk – The Seventh Circuit is Watching its Appellants and Weighing in on Best Practices on Appeal | JD Supra
Updated: May 25, 2018: JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.
K&L Gates Triage: Five Key Questions for Academic Medical Centers About Patent Ownership and Enforcement | JD Supra
Updated: May 25, 2018: JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.
Stopping Traffick: Actions Before the U.S. International Trade Commission to Stop Unfair and Unethically-Sourced Competition | JD Supra
JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations. This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services").
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with George
Contact George, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack