Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Grant Esposito
Crafting The Compelling Narrative (Video)
A compelling narrative serves as the framework through which we shape perception, execute strategy, and help clients achieve their goals. Partner Grant Esposito underscores that the most persuasive arguments are informed by holistically assessing the client's needs and then meticulously crafting a discrete set of unassailable points — capable of neutralizing opposition, focusing the jurors' attention, and driving toward the desired outcome.
Ceglio et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Nicholas Ceglio, Danny Commerton, Christine Ferguson, Laura Lauridia, Steven V Miller, Theresa Monteleone, Angelo Munni, Robert Sprague, Donald Tiedemann and Maryann Thornton Defendant: Northrop Grumman Corporation and Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Case Number: 2:2023cv06599 Filed: September 5, 2023 Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod.
The Supreme Court Expands The Cost Of Doing Business: New Rules For Jurisdiction By Consent After Mallory?
Can a state require a company, as a condition of doing business in the state, to consent to being sued there for any and all claims? In Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 599 U.S. __ (2023), the Supreme Court concluded that such a requirement is consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause. Mallory opens the door to a major increase in out-of-state corporations' exposure to suit—if states decide to walk through that door.
The Supreme Court Expands the Cost of Doing Business: New Rules for Jurisdiction by Consent After Mallory? | JD Supra
Can a state require a company, as a condition of doing business in the state, to consent to being sued there for any and all claims? In Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 599 U.S. __ (2023), the Supreme Court concluded that such a requirement is consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause. Mallory opens the door to a major increase in out-of-state corporations’ exposure to suit—if states decide to walk through that door.
Cost Of Doing Business? Supreme Court Scrutinizes Constitutionality Of Requiring Companies To Consent To General Personal Jurisdiction | JD Supra
In an important case that could blow the doors open on personal jurisdiction so that corporations can be subject to suit anywhere they do business, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday. In Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., the Court must decide whether Pennsylvania can require companies to submit to general personal jurisdiction as a condition of registering to do business in the state.
New York Gov. Hochul Signs Law Requiring Increased Financial Assistance To New York State Foster Families
United States: New York Gov. Hochul Signs Law Requiring Increased Financial Assistance To New York State Foster Families 18 April 2022 by Grant J.
Litigators Of The Week: The Morrison & Foerster Duo Who Went On The Offensive For A Client Targeted In A Short And Distort Attack
United States: Litigators Of The Week: The Morrison & Foerster Duo Who Went On The Offensive For A Client Targeted In A Short And Distort Attack 12 July 2021 by Michael D. Birnbaum (San Francisco) , Scott Llewellyn (Denver), Justin R. Salon (Washington, DC), Grant Esposito (San Francisco), Shaelyn Dawson (San Francisco), Sarah Elizabeth Barr (San Francisco) and Brenden J.
Close Enough: Horseshoes, Hand Grenades, And Specific Personal Jurisdiction
United States: Close Enough: Horseshoes, Hand Grenades, And Specific Personal Jurisdiction 29 March 2021 by Grant J. Esposito and Brian Matsui Morrison & Foerster LLP Your LinkedIn Connections with the authors To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. How close a connection does there need to be between a lawsuit and the defendant's in-state activities for specific personal jurisdiction to apply?
Close Enough: Horseshoes, Hand Grenades, And Specific Personal Jurisdiction | JD Supra
How close a connection does there need to be between a lawsuit and the defendant’s in-state activities for specific personal jurisdiction to apply? The Supreme Court issued a decision on that issue today in Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court and Ford Motor Co. v. Bandemer.
Transportation Cases To Watch In 2021
United States: Transportation Cases To Watch In 2021 13 January 2021 by Grant J. Esposito and Brian Matsui Morrison & Foerster LLP Your LinkedIn Connections with the authors To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Once More Into The Jurisdictional Morass: Supreme Court Grapples With Specific Jurisdiction At Oral Argument In Ford Cases
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice): Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below. Mondaq has a "free to view" business model.
Once More Into The Jurisdictional Morass: Supreme Court Grapples With Specific Jurisdiction At Oral Argument In Ford Cases | JD Supra
The Supreme Court heard roughly an hour of oral argument on Wednesday in a pair of cases against Ford Motor Company raising important questions about the scope of personal jurisdiction. In Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court and Ford Motor Co. v.
Getting Specific: Supreme Court Once Again Examines Limits Of Personal Jurisdiction In Ford Motor Company Cases | JD Supra
Despite their repeated efforts to provide guidance to lower courts, the Justices once again find themselves in a familiar position: attempting to clarify the constitutional limits on courts’ power to exercise personal jurisdiction over defendants. The Supreme Court’s docket has seen a steady stream of personal jurisdiction cases in recent years. But the lower courts just can’t seem to get it right. See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 137 S.
The U.S. Supreme Court Will Yet Again Review The Constitutional Limits Of Personal Jurisdiction In A Pair Of Cases Involving Ford Motor Company
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice): Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below. Mondaq has a "free to view" business model.
Court Of Chancery Rejects Common Company Defenses To Stockholder Inspection Demands, Creating Split Of Authority Within Delaware | JD Supra
Updated: May 25, 2018: JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.
Start Your Engines: The U.S. Supreme Will Yet Again Review The Constitutional Limits Of Personal Jurisdiction In A Pair Of Cases Involving Ford Motor Company | Morrison & Foerster LLP - JDSupra
Updated: May 25, 2018: JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.
Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Lower Court’s Material Adverse Effect Finding | JD Supra
JD Supra Privacy Policy Updated: May 25, 2018: JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.
Delaware Court of Chancery Finds a Material Adverse Event and Excuses Buyer from Obligation to Close in Akorn v. Fresenius Kabi AG | JD Supra
JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations. This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services").
Reaffirming Personal Jurisdiction Limits At High Court
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Already signed up? Log in here By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Grant
Contact Grant, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack