Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Heidi Smucker
Mounting regulatory scrutiny over algorithmic pricing necessitates robust internal controls
This is an Insight article, written by a selected contributor as part of GCR's co-published content. Read more on Insight In summary Algorithmic pricing tools have come under increasing scrutiny from government regulators and private litigants. Detractors from both the public and private sectors allege that these pricing tools help facilitate collusion among competitors, especially where the algorithm relies on non-public data when making pricing recommendations.
Rare Robinson-Patman Ruling Exhibits Key Antitrust Risk
By Teisha Johnson, Daniel Graulich and Heidi Smucker (June 14, 2024, 3:33 PM EDT) -- On May 20, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California affirmed a seven-figure jury verdict and granted a permanent injunction in a rare Robinson-Patman Act decision.... Law360 is on it, so you are, too. A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence.
District court dismisses petition to enforce arbitration award against Spain for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, relying on the Achmea decision
Share Share on Facebook Share on Twitter LinkedIn Blasket Renewable Investments v. Kingdom of Spain, No. 1:21-cv-3249-RJL (D.D.C. Mar. 29, 2023).[1] Factual Background In 2007, two Dutch companies, AES Solar Energy Coöperatief U.A. and Ampere Equity Fund B.V. (collectively, the “Companies”), invested in renewable energy projects in order to take advantage of favorable tax incentives offered by the Kingdom of Spain (“Spain”).
Paris Court of Appeal: Claims for reimbursement of expenses incurred during criminal proceedings are not covered by the arbitration clause
Factual Background In 2012, Mr. X bought a catamaran put up for sale by Mr. Y, who owned this catamaran through a British Virgin Islands company called Song Saigon Ltd. Mr. X acquired the catamaran for EUR 1.22 million through two agreements successively signed with Song Saigon Ltd in the form of a memorandum of agreement (MoA) and a share sale and purchase agreement (SSPA), under which Mr. Y transferred all of his shares in Song Saigon Ltd to Mr. X.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Heidi
Contact Heidi, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack