Skip To Main Content
Jahmy Graham on Muck Rack

Jahmy Graham

As seen in: JD Supra, Lexology
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile
Back to Jahmy Graham’s profile

Articles by Jahmy Graham

No Harm, no Foul-With TransUnion v. Ramirez, the Supreme Court Holds that Article III Does not Permit a Damages Class Where Much of the Class Suffered no Injury | Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP - JDSupra

|
By Jahmy Graham, Matthew Lindenbaum, Melanie L Todman
| JD Supra
Or to put it in legalese—“no concrete harm, no standing.”  It does not get more simple than that. On June 25, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Trans Union v. Ramirez (“Ramirez”), a case involving whether class members who suffer no actual injury can be included in a damages class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. In a 5-4 decision written by Justice Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court held that they cannot because they do not have standing under Article III of the Constitution.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

No Harm, no Foul-With TransUnion v. Ramirez, the Supreme Court Holds that Fed. Rule Civ. P. 23 Does not Permit a Damages Class Where Much of the Class Suffered no Injury - Lexology

|
By Matthew Lindenbaum, Melanie L Todman, Jahmy Graham
| Lexology Verified
The Vault Or to put it in legalese—“no concrete harm, no standing.” It does not get more simple than that. On June 25, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Trans Union v. Ramirez (“Ramirez”), a case involving whether class members who suffer no actual injury can be included in a damages class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. In a 5-4 decision written by Justice Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court held that they cannot because they do not have standing under Article III of the Constitution.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
Show More