Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by John Chedid
La Cour suprême du Canada refuse d'autoriser l'appel dans deux affaires d'arbitrage
Patrick Lapierre’s articles from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP are most popular: with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel in Canada Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP are most popular: with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy and Healthcare industries Le 18 septembre 2025, la Cour suprême du Canada a refusé d'autoriser l'appel dans deux affaires d'arbitrage bien en vue. D'abord, la Cour suprême a rejeté la demande d'autorisation d'appel dans l'affaire États-Unis mexicainsc.
Supreme Court Of Canada Declines Leave To Appeal In Two Arbitration Cases
Patrick Lapierre’s articles from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP are most popular: with readers working within the Healthcare industries Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP are most popular: within Law Department Performance topic(s) with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives in Canada On September 18, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada declined leave to appeal with respect to two high-profile arbitration cases.
Supreme Court of Canada Declines Leave to Appeal in Two Arbitration Cases | JD Supra
On September 18, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada declined leave to appeal with respect to two high-profile arbitration cases. First, the Supreme Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal in United Mexican States v. Vento Motorcycles, Inc. (Vento). In Vento, the Court of Appeal for Ontario set aside the award of an arbitral panel due to a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of one panel member.
Une clause de règlement des différends par étapes n'empêche pas le recours à l'arbitrage, selon la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario
Dans l'affaire J.P. Thomson Architects Ltd. v. Greater Essex County District School Board (l'« affaire Thomson v. Essex School Board »), la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario (la « CAO ») a conclu qu'une clause de règlement des différends par étapes n'empêchait pas le recours à l'arbitrage alors que les étapes préalables à un tel recours n'avaient pas été menées à bien selon le délai prévu à la clause en question.
Ontario Court Of Appeal Finds Stepped Dispute Clause Does Not Bar Arbitration
In J.P. Thomson Architects Ltd. v. Greater Essex County District School Board (Thomson v. Essex School Board), the Court of Appeal for Ontario found that a "stepped" dispute resolution clause did not bar recourse to arbitration when pre-arbitration steps were not completed within the timeframe specified in the clause.
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds Stepped Dispute Clause Does Not Bar Arbitration | JD Supra
In J.P. Thomson Architects Ltd. v. Greater Essex County District School Board (Thomson v. Essex School Board), the Court of Appeal for Ontario found that a “stepped” dispute resolution clause did not bar recourse to arbitration when pre-arbitration steps were not completed within the timeframe specified in the clause.
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds Stepped Dispute Clause Does Not Bar Arbitration | Blakes
In J.P. Thomson Architects Ltd. v. Greater Essex County District School Board (Thomson v. Essex School Board), the Court of Appeal for Ontario found that a “stepped” dispute resolution clause did not bar recourse to arbitration when pre-arbitration steps were not completed within the timeframe specified in the clause.
SCC defines threshold for government liability in Charter infringement claim
ADVERTISEMENT Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now. By Claude Marseille and John Chedid ( October 18, 2024, 11:01 AM EDT) -- On July 19, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) delivered its judgment in Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, 2024 SCC 26, addressing a claim of damages against the federal government for enacting legislation that contravened the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms....
Charter Rights And State Liability: SCC Reiterates Threshold For Claims Against The State For Damages
On July 19, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) rendered judgment in Canada (Attorney General) v. Power (Power) on the availability of damages against the federal or provincial governments for enacting legislation contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). The SCC had previously opened the door to such claims in Mackin v. New Brunswick (Minister of Finance) (Mackin).
Charter Rights and State Liability: SCC Reiterates Threshold for Claims Against the State for Damage | JD Supra
On July 19, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) rendered judgment in Canada (Attorney General) v. Power (Power) on the availability of damages against the federal or provincial governments for enacting legislation contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). The SCC had previously opened the door to such claims in Mackin v. New Brunswick (Minister of Finance) (Mackin).
Charter Rights and State Liability: SCC Reiterates Threshold for Claims Against the State for Damage | Blakes
On July 19, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) rendered judgment in Canada (Attorney General) v. Power (Power) on the availability of damages against the federal or provincial governments for enacting legislation contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). The SCC had previously opened the door to such claims in Mackin v. New Brunswick (Minister of Finance) (Mackin).
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with John
Contact John, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack