Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Jonathan Tuminaro
Update: FTC’s Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Set Aside | JD Supra
On May 7, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule that renders invalid non-compete clauses in standard employment agreements. 16 C.F.R. § 910. On August 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued final judgment setting aside the FTC’s Final Rule.
Update Regarding FTC’s Ban on Non-Compete Agreements | JD Supra
On May 7, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule that renders invalid non-compete clauses in standard employment agreements. 16 C.F.R. § 910. On July 3, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction barring the FTC from enforcing the Rule against the named plaintiffs in the Texas suit. The court declined to issue a nationwide injunction based on the record before it.
[Webinar] Navigating Trade Secrets Under the FTC’s Non-Compete Ban - June 12th, 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EDT | JD Supra
June 7, 2024 June 12th, 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EDT Paul Ainsworth, Christopher O'Brien, Jonathan Tuminaro, Ph.D. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. + Follow x Following x Following - Unfollow Contact To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: June 12th, 2024 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM EDT The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently issued a Final Rule that invalidates non-compete clauses in standard employment agreements.
FTC Issues Final Rule Banning (Almost All) Non-Compete Agreements | JD Supra
On May 7, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule that renders invalid non-compete clauses in standard employment agreements. 16 C.F.R. § 910. Although some limited exceptions apply, this new regulation imposes a nationwide and retroactive ban on non-compete clauses and also requires employers to notify their current and former employees to tell them that existing non-compete agreements are no longer effective.
[Webinar] The Interplay Between District Court and PTAB: Estoppels, Evidentiary, Recovery - April 5th, 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EDT | JD Supra
April 5th, 2022 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM EDT In conjunction with the release of the firm's year-in-review report, our speakers will discuss the recent cases surrounding IPR estoppels, evidentiary issues, and recovery, which notably highlight the interplay between the district court and the PTAB in which a decision in one tribunal can influence another.
2021 PTAB Year in Review: Analysis & Trends: IPR Estoppels: A Power Imbalance for Plaintiffs and Defendants | JD Supra
Introduction Inter partes review (IPR) proceedings raise complex estoppel issues that courts are grappling with and patent litigants must consider. Because patent challengers can assert invalidity in three different tribunals (the district courts, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC), and the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)), estoppels and their impact have taken on an increasingly important role in patent litigation.
2019 PTAB Year in Review: Analysis & Trends: Dramatic Changes to Motion to Amend Practice | JD Supra
Updated: May 25, 2018: JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Jonathan
Contact Jonathan, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack