Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Julian Feinauer
[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB Graduation
Hi all, as already stated some time ago [1], the Apacher IoTDB community decided that it feels ready to graduate. The maturity assesment is done [2], and the community agreed on starting the graduation process in a formal vote [3] (result see [4]).
[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB considers graduation
Hi folks, on the IoTDB mailing list we already had a discussion about our maturity for graduation, see [1] and recently started a vote if the community wants to start the graduation process [2]. We also filled all materials necessary, see e.g. the maturity evaluation [3] and got positive feedback from our mentors. So I just wanted to inform this list and also start a discussion about others thoughts about IoTDBs graduation.
[VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.10.1
Hi, my vote is +1 (binding). I checked: - Downloaded staged artefacts and checked signature and hash - Incubating in name - License and Notice file are fine - README and RELEASE_NOTES are fine - No unexpected binaries in source release - Builds sucessfull on macOS 10.15.5 Great Job Team! Julian Am 19.08.20, 16:17 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <sainthxd@gmail.com>: Hi, > I just have a quick question about the README files. Why do we put them into the release directory? Thanks, Willem.
[VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.9.3
Hi, my vote is +1 (binding). I checked: - Downloaded Sources - Checked Signatures and Hashes are ok - LICENSE, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and README are fine - Hive and Commons Notice seems outdated (2018, 2019) - Unzipped Archive - No unexpected Binaries - No Snapshot dependencies - Run build ("mvn clean install") - Comment: Fails with non-english locale.
[VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.9.2
Hi, my vote is +1 (binding). I Checked: - Downloaded files and checked sig and hash - checked LIC, RELEASE_NOTES, README, NOTICE - DISCLAIMER is included - No unexpected binary files - Built according to instructions in README (some tests fail due to locale being not US) - did NOT check binaries Julian Am 21.04.20, 16:23 schrieb "Willem Jiang" <willem.jiang@gmail.com>: +1.（Binding） Download links are valid. Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. DISCLAIMER is included. Checked the git tag.
[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator
Congratulations to the Streampipes Team : ) Julian Am 11.11.19, 09:51 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>: Hi all, usually the initiator of the vote also closes it ... However there were several "+1" without "binding" or "non-binding" so I had to check the IPMC list in whimsy to find out. And the results are: +1 binding: 16 +1 non-binding: 2 0: 0 -1: 0 So the vote passes and I'll start the process on transitioning StreamPipes into the incubator.
[DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?
Thanks Greg, I didn't know that! Julian Am 07.11.19, 19:24 schrieb "Greg Stein" <gstein@gmail.com>: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Distribution+via+the+Apple+App+Store On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:14 PM Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote: > An app signed by the Foundation is most definitely associated with the > ASF. The Foundation has an Apple Developer Account for exactly this reason.
[VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator
Hi Dominik, I like StreamPipes, as you know, thus my vote is +1 (binding) Julian Am 07.11.19, 20:00 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" <riemer@fzi.de>: Hi all, following up the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPipes (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1cf79ef65888f695b4b925fd67ef8a2b845f6b0931c251a0ff1115e1@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E), I would like to call a VOTE to accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator.
[DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?
Hi, I think this cannot be done as PMC or PPMC as it would be a "binary release" which we cannot do with the ASF policy. So I think another entity than the ASF / the PMC would need to put the App in the store, and then you are also free with regards to releases. Julian Am 07.11.19, 14:34 schrieb "申远" <shenyuancs@gmail.com>: I am OK with the normal release procedure if we have to.
[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Hi Anatole, first, congratulations, nicely done (took some stamina to over several RCs...)! Second, little commnt, the binding votes where from IPMC not PPMC : ) Julian Am 07.11.19, 12:04 schrieb "Anatole Tresch" <atsticks@gmail.com>: Thank you all vor voting.
[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Hi Justin, yes, this is a minor issue (overcompensation of the to few hashes in the last RC) but thanks for the vote! Julian Am 05.11.19, 22:56 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com>: Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exits - LICENSE and NOTICE fine - All files have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files - can compile from source You seem to have gone a little overboard on the hashes, just sha512 and asc are needed and...
[DISCUSS] StreamPipes proposal
Hi, it would of course be awesome to have JB on board. And indeed what JB suggests was the way I was also thinking of Streampipes and had a several discussions with Dominik already. Currently, Streampipes is some kind of mediator between several "external" engines running in different processes or even different nodes.
[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating
Hi everybody, we would be really happy and grateful if we find two more people to vote on the tamaya release. @Justin Mclean as you already assisted in one RC (by the mandatory -1 Vote) you probably find some time to jump in again (a +1 would be welcome this time :P ). Thanks! Julian Am 23.10.19, 09:09 schrieb "Anatole Tresch" <atsticks@gmail.com>: Hi, The Tamaya team was running the needed tasks to get the 0.4-incubating release of Tamaya out.
Write Access to Incubator Wiki
Hi Kenn, knowing the "core-team" behind it personally I agree with your point. It is a small and not diverse community (from one institution currently) behind the project. So an important part of the discussion here is also to get feedback from other individuals and communities what they think and if they are willing to be part of such a project.
Leaving the incubator
Hi all, as already discussed before the Podling Edgent is “too dead” to be revived. The PPMC has thus voted to leave the incubator [1,2] and we will move the project to GitHub, perhaps some interest will stay. What are the next (formal) steps. Do we hold a Vote for the IPMC?
[DISCUSS] TubeMQ Proposal
Hi David, thanks for the nice proposal. I think it was already introduced a bit at the ApacheCon NA so it may already be known a bit to some folks. The proposal reads quite nice and TubeMQ seems to be a really nice project and has some impressive capabilities and USPs. Although, those who know me know that I tend to be concerned a lot. The two main concerns I see here are not really related to the project in detail but rather to two general questions.
Donation of subproject for PLC4X
Thanks for jumping in Chris, yes. We never liked the name anyway but never had a better one : ) But currently we are discussing that with the community to hiopefully come up with a better one. Julian Am 07.10.19, 11:28 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>: Hi all, We have that on our radar and that's why we're discussion naming options. We're not planning or ever had planned naming it "Crunch".
Donation of subproject for PLC4X
Thanks Bertrand, I will start editing the IP Clearance Form then! Julian Am 02.10.19, 14:36 schrieb "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacretaz@codeconsult.ch>: Hi, On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:59 PM Julian Feinauer <j.feinauer@pragmaticminds.de> wrote: > my company decided to donate our project CRUNCH [1] that has been developed internally to the ASF.... > ...We need to find a name and go through namesearch, or?... No, that's only for Apache PMCs which need to have a suitable name.
Donation of subproject for PLC4X
Hi all, my company decided to donate our project CRUNCH [1] that has been developed internally to the ASF. The idea is to integrate it as subproject into the PLC4X Project [2]. The PMC has already performed a VOTE on that task [3,4] and we also filed a Software Grant as well as CCLA and ICLAs for all committers of the project. What are the next steps to take? We need to find a name and go through namesearch, or? And also we need to do IP Clearance, or?
[VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.1.rc0
Hi Tao, Gratulations to the passed vote but a minor comment. The vote results should have the subject prefixed with [RESULT] [VOTE]...
[VOTE] Release Apache Milagro (incubating) Decentralized Trust Authority v0.1.0 (alpha release)
Hi, let me initially say, that the release locks pretty good and well prepared. But, unfortunately I found two issues I would consider major, thus I vote -1 (binding) Remember, this is no VETO so this does not necessarily stop the release. But from my experience its easier to fix things while you still are in release mode than after one. The two major issues I see are the Headers and the failing build of dta.
Incubator podling reports due today
Hi Justin, I know that Tamaya is late (we discussed that already today off-list) and I sent multiple mails to the list the last 2 days but got no response yet. They are currently in the process of doing a release we had some issues in first rc but things should be fixed soon, so I really hope that there will be a response soon.
When is tamaya supposed to report next time?
Hi, as I’m pretty new in the tamaya project… when is tamaya scheduled for the next incubator report? From the records it seems like they missed the last time but I don’t see them on the current wiki page? Thanks! Julian
[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.34.0
Congratulations! : ) Am 28.08.19, 10:15 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com>: Hi, It’s great to see superset finally get an offical release out. Thanks, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Accept DolphinScheduler(was EasyScheduler) into Apache Incubator
Hi, Your proposal looks good and the initiual PPMC already looks 'diverse'. Furthermore, it seems like you have a good mentoring team on board. One 'minor' concern is that I think it is best to use Apaches Infra for CI and Issue tracking. Which I would greatly prefer over using Github issues. But overall, a clear +1 (binding) from my side.
[VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 [RC1]
Hi, I agree with Alan that its really minor but as the signatures will change I would prefer another Vote to have this checked. If you (as Justin suggests) state your changes clearly in the thread I think everybody will easily carry over the vote from the previous thread so its just about waiting 72hrs but ensure that everything is alright. Julian Am 22.08.19, 19:21 schrieb "Alan Gates" <alanfgates@gmail.com>: I would call a revote over that, it's not like you're changing anything of import.
[VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.4.0 (incubating) [rc1]
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes match - checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE - No unexpected binary - Can compile from source on macOS Mojave Julian Am 21.08.19, 05:15 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com>: Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE fine (but see below) - All source files have ASF header - No unexpected binary files - Can compile from source I...
[VOTE] Release Apache Milagro (incubating) Crypto Libraries v1.0.0
Hi all, +1 (binding) I checked - Download links are valid - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for C - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for JS - DISCLAIMER, LICENCE & NOTICE files are included - Artefacts have incubating in name - No compiled binaries are included - C Libraries build correctly and all tests pass (make)on macOS Mojave 10.14.4 - JS Libraries build correctly and all tests pass (npm install and npm test) on macOS Mojave 10.14.4 Minor issues found: - Your KEY File is in...
[OFFER] Offer to Mentor one or two podlings
Hi Javi, hi John, I will have a look and register to the mailing lists. I was also pointet to Milagro, so I'll also check that out : ) Julian Am 20.08.19, 20:11 schrieb "Javi Roman" <jroman.espinar@gmail.com>: At Apache Myriad we need some help, our more active mentor is really busy right now.
[VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 [RC1]
Hi, as it seems like the PPMC vote is already closed I'll repost my vote here...
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3
Hello all, the vote to release Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.0 RC3 has passed with 4 +1 Votes. Binding Votes: Justin McLean Christofer Dutz Kevin A. McGrail Julian Feinauer No further Votes were cast.
Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank
IoTDB Podling is Interested! Julian Am 15.08.19, 15:04 schrieb "Dmytro Liaskovskyi" <Dmytro_Liaskovskyi@epam.com.INVALID>: DLab podling is interested DMYTRO LIASKOVSKYI Software Engineering Manager Office: +380 322 424 642 x 57729 <tel:+380%20322%20424%20642;ext=57729> Cell: +380 97 341 1315 <tel:+380%2097%20341%201315> Email: dmytro_liaskovskyi@epam.com Lviv, Ukraine epam.com <http://www.epam.com/> CONFIDENTIALITY CAUTION AND DISCLAIMER This message is intended only for the use of the...
[DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)
Hi Greg, I think Justins Answer refers to the WIP-Disclaimer which was recently added to the incubator Policy Page: https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers A Podlings releasing with the WIP Disclaimer is no ASF release, so I consider Justins response is no misdirection and I would also agree on that. Julian PS.: Allow me to add a very personal side note. But it seems to me that the tone in this discussion is from time to time rather harsh.
[LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3
Hello all, This is a call for vote to release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) version 0.8.0, which is the first Apache Release for the IoTDB Project. The Apache IoTDB community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) version 0.8.0. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Apache IoTDB (incubating) (Database for Internet of Things) is an integrated data management engine designed for timeseries data.
[OFFER] Offer to Mentor one or two podlings
Hi, this goes to the IPMC as well as to podlings watching this list. I just recently became IPMC member and am currently pretty active in the IoTDB Project as “informal mentor” (started there before becoming IPMC member) together with 3 other pretty active mentors. As I received a lot of help from mentors and learned a lot about the Apache Way since I joined incubating projects, I think its time now to give something back. I could join one or two other podlings as Mentor if I am needed.
[DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking
Hi, I'm a new IPMC Member (no foundation member) and come from a PLC4X which has graduated months ago. I already started to help other Podlings a bit. And I agree with Dave in the sense that we should seek our way not in locking-out people but in finding ways to draw in more people. It was already said multiple times that people from "mature" podlings or freshly graduated projects would be a good call as mentors this should be ONE way to go.
[DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)
Hi Ted, dont get me wrong, I'm rather new to the ASF, the incubator and especially the IPMC. So my perspective might be different. But, I understand the frustration that some may have and I leant that there have been many trials to change things which didn’t go the way we wanted. The "fear" or concerns I have is that loosening some requirements feels a bit like resigning which would be a horrible thing as the incubator is one of the (if not the) most important projects in the ASF.
[DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)
Hi Ted, but instead of questioning the Bylaws or introducing two classes of artifacts I would rather try to improve mentor votes as this is something we can do incubator internal. And its always better to cure the cause then the symptoms : ) Julian Am 12.08.19, 16:44 schrieb "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunning@gmail.com>: On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:20 AM Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote: > ... > This does NOT mean that the IPMC should be gatekeepers though...
[DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases
Hi, I'm answering to this (old) thread as the new one branched up with a different topic. Personally, during my time in the first podling I learned a lot by doing Apache Releases. First, as contributor, then as PPMC and finally as RM. And this is something valuable and if a project wants to become a TLP something people have to learn. And not only one or two but better every PPMC member (and some even able to RM). So I suggest to encourage Podlings as much as possible to to ASF releases.
[DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases
Hi, thanks Justin for bringing that up. I have perhaps a different perspective than many others because I was / am mostly active in several podlings and just very recently became IPMC member (no apache member).
Draft incubator report
+1, I like that formulation. On 2019/04/09 09:26:00, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Julian Feinauer <jfeinauer@apache.org> wrote: > > ...If its these "drive-by comments" that are annoying then I would name that so, e.g. "What > > seems less helpful in some cases is involvement of non-IPMC members which drop > > comments and leave the discussion then....
Draft incubator report
Hi, thanks for your clarification. I can only speak for myself and I try to involve in discussions where I think I can be helpful or where I have a strong opinion (usually from the podling perspective). But, of course, I do not want to disturb things or annoy people on these lists, so I was a bit confused by the sentence, as it is, indeed, a public list.
Draft incubator report
Hi Justin, thanks for the report. I agree with all thats listed there, but theres one passage which I dont understand or which makes me think... it is: Having a smaller IPMC was discussed, it was suggested that anyone not signed up to the private list be removed from the IPMC. This was looked into and people who make infrequent contributors are still helpful and make useful contributions. What seems less helpful in some cases is involvement of non-IPMC members on this list.
[VOTE] Accept DataSketches into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Am 15.03.19, 10:50 schrieb "Byung-Gon Chun" <bgchun@gmail.com>: +1 (binding) On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 6:34 PM Furkan KAMACI <furkankamaci@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > 15 Mar 2019 Cum, saat 07:08 tarihinde Kevin A. McGrail < > kmcgrail@apache.org> > şunu yazdı: > > > I'd like to vote -1 since you made me look up the word "stochastic" and > > that feels like homework but I will vote +1 (binding). Please don't > > make me do any math.
Mentors and Voting on Podling Releases
Hi Dave, thanks for your feedback. I totally agree with what you say and from all the discussions I read, I have the impression that there is a good direction where many IPMC members think this should be going and the "right" points are addressed. Regarding the release process: We just had a discussion in a podling to do regular releases but agreed that to discuss the topic futher AFTER graduation to keep the workload for the IPMC low.
Mentors and Voting on Podling Releases
Hi all, I just wanted to bring back a short summary of a discussion we had with Craig Russel on a private list regarding the role of podling mentors in the release approval process. And as there are currently many thoughts and discussions going on about these topics, I thought it would be good to have the essence of the discussion public. Basically the point was when mentors should vote. In the IPMC Vote only or already in the Podlings Vote.
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.1 [RC1]
Hello all, The vote for releasing Apache PLC4X 0.3.1-RC1 (incubating) is closed, now. Vote result: 5 (+1 binding) (cdutz, gtrasuk, jmclean, bodewig, lresende) 0 (0 binding) 0 (-1 binding) And no non-binding votes. Thank you everyone for taking the time to review the release and help us. I will process to publish the release and send ANNOUNCE. Julian Apache PLC4X
[VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.1 [RC1]
Hello all, This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.1. The Apache PLC4X community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.1. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Apache PLC4X (incubating) is a set of libraries for communicating with industrial programmable logic controllers (PLCs) using a variety of protocols but with a shared API.
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 [RC2]
Hello all, The vote for releasing Apache PLC4X 0.3.0-RC2 (incubating) is closed, now. Vote result: 3 (+1 binding) (Stefan Bodewig, Justin McLean, Christofer Dutz) 0 ( 0 binding) 0 (-1 binding) No non-binding votes. Thank you everyone for taking the time to review the release and help us. I will process to publish the release and send ANNOUNCE. Julian Apache PLC4X
Request for write access for wiki
Indeed, strange, but nonetheless, thank you Justin! Am 03.02.19, 12:02 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <justinmclean@me.com>: Hi, > I request write access tot he incubator wiki to submit the Report for Edgent. > My username is “jfeinauer”. Looks like you already have permission.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Julian
Contact Julian, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack