Skip To Main Content
Justin Negler on Muck Rack

Justin Negler

As seen in: Lexology, Mondaq
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile
Back to Justin Negler’s profile

Articles by Justin Negler

Australian Designs: Reading Between The (Broken) Lines

|
By William R. Sidebottom, Ben Dziekan, Justin Negler
| Mondaq
In Wynnes Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys Pty Ltd v Wamlez Pty Ltd [2023] ADO 3, the Australian Designs Office considered a third-party request to be heard in respect of the validity of certified design number 201712220 (the Design).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Australian Designs: Reading Between the (Broken) Lines

|
By William R. Sidebottom, Ben Dziekan, Justin Negler
| Lexology Verified
Introduction In Wynnes Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys Pty Ltd v Wamlez Pty Ltd [2023] ADO 3, the Australian Designs Office considered a third-party request to be heard in respect of the validity of certified design number 201712220 (the Design).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

TCT Vs Polaris - Patent - Australia

|
By Justin Negler, Ben Dziekan
| Mondaq
Recent Australian Federal Court decision TCT Group Pty Ltd v Polaris IP Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1493 is particularly notable for its exploration of support in an external document – namely an earlier filed patent application. The decision provides a cautionary tale to patent applicants and legal practitioners alike, addressing essential considerations for both sufficiency and support requirements under Australian patent law, and interparty communications with an alleged infringer.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Invention Protection: The Decision To Patent Or Rely On A Trade Secret

|
By Jacqueline Simpkin, Justin Negler
| Mondaq
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. A common but complex problem facing businesses seeking to commercially benefit from an invention is how to protect the invention for their own use. This can be achieved through the grant of a patent or by keeping the invention a 'trade secret'. Product inventions may be complex, but often the best inventions are simple fixes to common problems. An example of a very simple, and highly useful invention, is dental floss.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
Show More