Skip To Main Content
Madalyn Macarr on Muck Rack

Madalyn Macarr

As seen in: JD Supra, The National Law Review, Lexology, Mondaq, LexBlog
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile
Back to Madalyn Macarr’s profile

Articles by Madalyn Macarr

California State Court Declines To Expand Standing For Claims Under 1933 Act

|
By John Stigi, Madalyn Macarr
| Mondaq
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice): Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below. Mondaq has a "free to view" business model.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

California State Court Declines to Expand Standing for Claims Under 1933 Act | JD Supra

|
By Madalyn Macarr, John Stigi lll
| JD Supra
Updated: May 25, 2018: JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

California State Court Declines to Expand Standing for Claims Under 1933 Act | Lexology

|
By Madalyn Macarr, Sheppard Mullin Richter, Hampton LLP
| Lexology Verified
In Jensen v. iShares Trust, 2020 Cal. App. LEXIS 61 (Cal. App. Jan. 23, 2020), a rare state court decision addressing claims under the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”), the California Court of Appeal rejected plaintiffs-appellants’ attempt to evade the “tracing” requirement under Section 11, 15. U.S.C. § 77k, which provides standing only to those plaintiffs who can trace their shares purchased in a secondary market transaction to an initial offering made under a misleading registration statement.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

California State Court Declines to Expand Standing for Claims Under 1933 Act

|
By Madalyn Macarr
| The National Law Review Verified
Monday, February 3, 2020 In Jensen v. iShares Trust, 2020 Cal. App. LEXIS 61 (Cal. App. Jan. 23, 2020), a rare state court decision addressing claims under the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”), the California Court of Appeal rejected plaintiffs-appellants’ attempt to evade the “tracing” requirement under Section 11, 15.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

California State Court Declines to Expand Standing for Claims Under 1933 Act

|
By John Stigi, Madalyn Macarr
| LexBlog
In Jensen v. iShares Trust, 2020 Cal. App. LEXIS 61 (Cal. App. Jan. 23, 2020), a rare state court decision addressing claims under the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”), the California Court of Appeal rejected plaintiffs-appellants’ attempt to evade the “tracing” requirement under Section 11, 15. U.S.C. § 77k, which provides standing only to those plaintiffs who can trace their shares purchased in a secondary market transaction to an initial offering made under a misleading registration statement.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
Show More