Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Matthew T. Biggers
Fifth Circuit Remands ESG Rule In First ERISA Test Case Post-Chevron
In its recent decision in State of Utah v. Su, the Fifth Circuit remanded a challenge to the Department of Labor's (DOL) environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rule for investing in defined contribution retirement plans after the Supreme Court's recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.
Fifth Circuit Remands ESG Rule in First ERISA Test Case Post-Chevron | JD Supra
In its recent decision in State of Utah v. Su, the Fifth Circuit remanded a challenge to the Department of Labor’s (DOL) environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rule for investing in defined contribution retirement plans after the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.
Fifth Circuit Remands ESG Rule in First ERISA Test Case Post-Chevron
In its recent decision in State of Utah v. Su, the Fifth Circuit remanded a challenge to the Department of Labor’s (DOL) environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rule for investing in defined contribution retirement plans after the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.
Evonik Corporation Beats 401(k) Plan Challenge with Evidence of Rigorous Fiduciary Process | JD Supra
A New Jersey federal district court recently granted summary judgment in defendants’ favor in an ERISA excessive fee case accusing Evonik’s 401(k) plan fiduciaries of keeping imprudent investments in the plan and of allowing participants to pay excessive recordkeeping fees. Harris, et al. v. Evonik Corp., et al., No. 20-02202, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS _____ (D.N.J. Jun. 28, 2024).
Evonik Corporation Beats 401(k) Plan Challenge With Evidence Of Rigorous Fiduciary Process
A New Jersey federal district court recently granted summary judgment in defendants' favor in an ERISA excessive fee case accusing Evonik's 401(k) plan fiduciaries of keeping imprudent investments in the plan and of allowing participants to pay excessive recordkeeping fees. Harris, et al. v. Evonik Corp., et al., No. 20-02202, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS _____ (D.N.J. Jun. 28, 2024).
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Matthew T.
Contact Matthew T., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack