Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Nate Tan
Post-TianRui: A Survey Of Trade Secret Litigation And Extraterritoriality In The ITC
1. Introduction In 2011, the Federal Circuit in TianRui Grp. Co. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n affirmed the International Trade Commission's (ITC) authority to look to extraterritorial conduct of a respondent to determine whether that respondent misappropriated trade secrets under 19 U.S.C.A. § 1337 ("Section 337"). In 2016, the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), which created a federal cause of action for trade secret misappropriation, was enacted.
Post-TianRui: A Survey of Trade Secret Litigation and Extraterritoriality in the ITC | JD Supra
1. Introduction In 2011, the Federal Circuit in TianRui Grp. Co. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n affirmed the International Trade Commission’s (ITC) authority to look to extraterritorial conduct of a respondent to determine whether that respondent misappropriated trade secrets under 19 U.S.C.A. § 1337 (“Section 337”). In 2016, the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), which created a federal cause of action for trade secret misappropriation, was enacted.
Cross-Border Discovery At The ITC
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. Litigants in Section 337 investigations at the International Trade Commission ("ITC") can seek discovery from foreign third parties by means of either (1) Hague letters of request, or (2) letters rogatory.
Cross-Border Discovery at the ITC | JD Supra
Litigants in Section 337 investigations at the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) can seek discovery from foreign third parties by means of either (1) Hague letters of request, or (2) letters rogatory. These highly similar mechanisms permit a party to request judicial assistance from foreign courts to obtain documents or deposition testimony from foreign third parties that decline to provide the information voluntarily.
Last Week in the Federal Circuit (August 16-20): Controlling for Authentication | JD Supra
It has been another steamy August week here in Washington and at the Federal Circuit, with eleven new opinions fresh off the press. Below we provide our usual weekly statistics and our case of the week—our highly subjective selection based on whatever case piqued our interest. Precedential opinions: 5 Non-precedential opinions: 6 Rule 36: 2 Longest pending case from argument: Tie between Campbell Soup Company v. Gamon Plus, Inc., No. 20-2322 and Campbell Soup Company v.
The History Behind Gentlemanly Action
Do you ever wonder why we gentleman do the things we do? At Forgetful Gentleman, we’ve always been fascinated by the origins of the gentlemanly actions we conduct every day. In some cases, understanding where our cultural norms come from can give us a renewed appreciation for them. In other cases, it just makes for fun trivia. Either way, we hope you’ll find these historical tidbits as interesting as we do.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Nate
Contact Nate, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack