Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Abstract Abstract We respond to two rejoinders to our review article “Science for Success,” which proposed fuller contextualization of epistemological approach, researcher position and interests in conservation research. This way readers—including reviewers and journal editors—can better understand and interpret findings.
Introduction In our review paper Science for Success (Koot, Hebinck, and Sullivan 2020), which went through three rounds of peer review with three anonymous reviewers, we emphasize the importance of researcher position and self-reflexivity for conservation and development professionals who do research about the programs they are involved in, as this can potentially create a conflict of interest.
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
