Amir Pichhadze

Excalibur — Title: "The artmaking process can be cooperative and intergenerational."

Excalibur — Artwork and poetry by Amir Pichhadze.

The Oxford Student — In commemoration of the Holocaust Memorial Day, article discusses examples from Jewish history about how people have overcome hardship.

The Oxford Student — Discussion of the path towards peace in the Middle East.

cjlpa.org — Article revisits the question, when is an artwork finished?

The Oxford Blue — Provides proposals on how to rethink the approach to tax pedagogy at the University of Oxford.

The Oxford Student — Article explores how to approach conducting tutorials without tutors.

papers.ssrn.com — Book review of "Transfer Pricing and the Arm's Length Principle After BEPS"

Canadian Tax Journal — The purpose of this article is to point out recent and significant developments that further support the author’s call to acknowledge the necessary role of contract interpretation in the process of delineating the actual controlled transaction when conducting a transfer-pricing analysis. The first development refers to recent cases in which Canada’s courts (1) have recognized the necessary role of contract interpretation in determining the true nature of a transfer-pricing arrangement, and (2) have exemplified the correct approach to identifying and applying the law of interpretation that governed the contractual terms. These cases ought to serve as an example to other courts, in Canada and around the world, when delineating the true nature of controlled transactions for the purposes of the transfer-pricing analysis. The second development is the explicit recognition by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, in its newly revised transfer-pricing guidelines, of the necessary role of contract interpretation in the transfer-pricing analysis. Considering these developments, it is hoped and expected that courts will not overlook this necessary task of contract interpretation. The risk of such oversight is exemplified in this article by the Supreme Court of Canada’s analysis in Canada v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc.