Rosser Newton
(He/Him)
Dallas
As seen in:
Medium
Covers:
Texas history, Reconstruction era politics, Richard Coke, historic preservation, the Alamo Letter Society, energy investing, oil and gas, oilfield services, private equity, corporate boards
Interview
What was your first job as a journalist?
I have never held a newsroom job. My career started in corporate finance at Goldman Sachs in New York, where I worked as an analyst from 1987 to 1989, and I have spent the years since in energy investing. The writing came later and came out of research rather than a beat. My first real published work in that vein was Richard Coke: Texan, which followed years in the archives.
Have you ever used a typewriter?
Yes, in school and early on in my first job. There is not much romance to it in practice, though it did teach you to think through a sentence before committing to it, since revision was expensive. These days I do appreciate typewritten documents from the other direction. A fair amount of twentieth century archival material comes to you as typescript with handwritten corrections in the margins, and those marks often tell you as much as the
How is social media changing news?
The distribution changed faster than the verification did. Something can reach a very large audience before anyone has checked whether it is true, and corrections never travel as far as the original claim.
The part I find more interesting is what it has done to history. Archives, libraries, and historical societies now put material directly in front of people who would never have made the trip to see it. That is a genuine gain. The tradeoff is that a confident, wrong summary of a nineteenth century figure can circulate for years while the primary record sits a click away and unread.
Who's your favorite fictional journalist?
Lou Grant. He never let anyone run a story on secondhand information, which is the same discipline archival research demands.
What does it mean to be a journalist?
Getting it right matters more than getting it first. That means going to the underlying record, showing your reader where the information came from, and being honest about what the evidence does not settle. In historical work you are writing about people who cannot correct you, which raises the obligation rather than lowering it. The same is true of business reporting, where the subject often has a strong interest in a particular version of events. In both cases the discipline is the same: follow the documents, and let the conclusion follow the evidence rather than the reverse.
What's the funniest news-related #hashtag you've seen?
Hashtags are not really my territory. If it helps, the closest thing I have is watching #TexasHistory turn up everything from serious archival finds to some very confident mythology about the Alamo. The range in a single feed is entertaining on its own.
How do you prefer to be pitched on stories?
Email, one to three paragraphs, mornings Central time. Lead with what the story actually is rather than the setup.
For history and preservation pitches, tell me what primary material sits behind it: correspondence, court records, legislative material, an archive that has just opened up. For energy pitches, be specific about the sector and the stage of the company.
One follow up is fine if you do not hear back. I try to respond when I can, though I do not always manage it.
What tools and software do you use to do your job?
For research, the digitized newspaper and records archives do most of the heavy lifting: the Portal to Texas History, Chronicling America, Newspapers.com, HathiTrust, and the census and genealogical databases. The Texas State Library and Archives and the Dolph Briscoe Center at UT Austin for material that has not been digitized, which is still a great deal of it.
For writing, nothing exotic. Word, a scanner, and a citation file I keep from the first day of a project so I am never reconstructing where something came from.
What's your favorite social network?
None of them, honestly. If I have to pick, the closest thing is the network of archivists, county historians, and historical society members who trade finds with each other. Most of that still happens over email and at meetings like the Texas State Historical Association's annual gathering rather than on a platform.
Who do you wish followed you?
County historical commissions and courthouse staff across Texas. The Alamo Letter Society has installed bronze plaques of William B. Travis's 1836 "Victory or Death" letter in twenty three counties so far, with more dedications planned, and the counties we have not reached yet are the ones I would most like to hear from.
Why did you become a journalist?
I did not set out to be one. I spent my career in energy investing and still run Petro Capital Group. What pulled me toward writing was the research itself. I am an indirect descendant of Richard Coke, the fifteenth governor of Texas, and the more I read about him the more I noticed how thin the record was. Digitization opened up correspondence, legislative debates, convention proceedings, and newspapers that were previously impractical to reach. Following that material for years turned into a book. The instinct is the same one I use in investing: go to the original documents and let the evidence tell you what happened.
Did you work for your high school newspaper? If so, what did you do there?
My writing life really started at Vanderbilt, where I received the university's class writing award for journalism. That was the first time I took the craft seriously as something separate from academic work.
What story are you most proud of writing or working on?
Richard Coke: Texan, published in November 2024 by Stoney Creek Publishing Group. It came out of years of archival work in correspondence, family records, legislative debates, constitutional convention proceedings, newspapers, census records, and city directories from the period. Coke was the fifteenth governor of Texas and then spent eighteen years in the United States Senate, and the existing record on him was thinner than a figure of that consequence deserved.
The recognition that meant the most was the Texas Senate adopting Senate Resolution 520 during the 89th Legislature, introduced by Senator Hall. It passed without objection with every member joining as a co-author.
What advice can you offer to aspiring journalists?
Go to the primary source. Correspondence, court records, census rolls, legislative journals, city directories. Most received wisdom about the nineteenth century traces back to a small number of secondary accounts that were themselves working from limited material. When you read the originals you often find the story is more complicated and more interesting than the version in circulation.
Second, be patient with the timeline. My book took years of archival work, and the good material almost never arrived on schedule.
Third, write down where every fact came from as you find it, not later. You will need it, and reconstructing a citation trail after the fact is miserable work.
When's the best time to pitch you?
Mornings, Central time, early in the week. Email is the best way to reach me. If the pitch involves Texas history, Reconstruction era research, historic preservation work, or the Alamo Letter Society, tell me what primary material is behind it. If it is on the energy side, be specific about the sector and the stage of the company.
What's the best pitch you ever got?
The ones I remember came from archivists and county historians rather than publicists. Someone would write to say a family collection had just been donated, or that a courthouse had turned up a run of records nobody had catalogued, and here is what is in it. Short, specific, and pointing at material rather than a narrative.
That is the model. Tell me what document exists and where it is, and let me decide what the story is.
What's the worst pitch you ever got?
I would rather describe the pattern than name anyone. The ones that miss are the mass emails that clearly went to a list, address me as a general news reporter, and pitch something with no connection to Texas history or energy. A close second is the pitch about a historical subject that cites only a secondary summary or an encyclopedia entry. If there is no primary material behind it, there is not much for me to work with.
What's your favorite drink?
Black coffee in the morning, which is when most of the archival work gets done. Iced tea the rest of the day, which is standard issue in Texas.
When you're not at a computer, where are you most likely to be?
Fishing or hiking, or in an archive somewhere in Texas. I also collect Texas historical memorabilia, so a fair amount of time goes to tracking down original documents and artifacts. Closer to home I am at the Dallas Arboretum and Botanical Garden, where I serve as Director Emeritus and as president of the Dallas Arboretum Foundation.
Aside from your own, what's your favorite publication to read?
The Southwestern Historical Quarterly, published by the Texas State Historical Association. It has been running since 1897, and the scholarship holds up. On the business side I read Hart Energy and the Dallas Morning News.
What's the most common misperception about your beat?
On the history side, that Reconstruction in Texas is a settled story with clear heroes and villains. The primary record is far messier than the summaries suggest. Richard Coke is a good example. He is usually reduced to a single line about the end of Reconstruction, and the correspondence, legislative debates, and convention proceedings show a much more complicated figure operating in a much more complicated period.
On the energy side, the misperception is that private capital in oil and gas is transactional and short term. The work I have done for more than two decades is the opposite: sit on the board, know the operations, and stay through the cycle.
Would you like to take the Muck Rack Interview?
Create a Muck Rack profile.