Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Results and discussions Conventional approaches in scientific literature searching. Literature searches conventionally rely on web-based search engines and scientific literature archives/databases (i.e., Google or PubMed) and generally follow the steps below (Fig 1A): Keyword Formulation: List essential keywords representing your research focus. Search Execution: Input keywords into search engines or databases.
Abstract There is a growing number of articles about conversational AI (i.e., ChatGPT) for generating scientific literature reviews and summaries. Yet, comparative evidence lags its wide adoption by many clinicians and researchers. We explored ChatGPT's utility for literature search from an end-user perspective through the lens of clinicians and biomedical researchers. We quantitatively compared basic versions of ChatGPT's utility against conventional search methods such as Google and PubMed.
Download Hi-Res ImageDownload to MS-PowerPointCite This:J. Proteome Res. 2024, XXXX, XXX RETURN TO ARTICLES ASAPPREVReviewsNEXT Julian Wolf Molecular Surgery Laboratory, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94305, United States Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94303, United States , Joel A.
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
