Skip To Main Content
Russell Potter on Muck Rack

Russell Potter

As seen in: American Bar Association, JD Supra, Mondaq
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile
Back to Russell Potter’s profile

Articles by Russell Potter

Antitrust Risks When Hospitals Share Senior Leadership: A Rural Experience

|
By Dylan Carson, Stephen Libowsky, David Reichenberg, Russell Potter
| Antitrust Magazine Verified
Cecilie_Arcurs via Getty Images Collusion among rivals has long been considered the “supreme evil of antitrust.” It is not surprising, therefore, that antitrust scrutiny was applied to one hospital’s decision to employ the Chief Executive Officer of its only competing hospital while the CEO still remained employed by the competitor, without any effort to integrate the hospitals clinically or financially or any effort to implement effective screening measures to protect against the sharing of...
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Unhealthy Alliance: Hospitals Sharing Senior Leadership Increases Antitrust Risk | JD Supra

|
By Dylan Carson, Stephen Libowsky, Russell Potter
| JD Supra
Collusion among rivals has long been considered the “supreme evil of antitrust.” It is not surprising, therefore, that antitrust scrutiny was applied to one hospital’s decision to employ the Chief Executive Officer of its only competing hospital while the CEO still remained employed by the competitor, without any effort to integrate the hospitals clinically or financially or any effort to implement effective screening measures to protect against the sharing of competitively sensitive...
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Fresh Off the Grill: No-Poach Agreements May Lead to Per Se Antitrust Liability, Says 7th Circuit | JD Supra

|
By Val Bianchi-Demicheli, Dylan Carson, Russell Potter
| JD Supra
Introduction No-poach agreements, wherein companies agree not to solicit or hire employees away from a competitor, have been targeted by the White House,1 the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division.2 Although the DOJ’s four criminal prosecutions stemming from no-poach agreements have yet to yield any guilty verdicts for Sherman Act violations, the Seventh Circuit recently weighed in on the potential legality under the antitrust laws of employee no-poach provisions in...
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Fresh Off The Grill: No-Poach Agreements May Lead To Per Se Antitrust Liability, Says 7th Circuit - Antitrust, EU Competition - United States

|
By Dylan Carson, Russell Potter, Val Bianchi-Demicheli
| Mondaq
No-poach agreements, wherein companies agree not to solicit or hire employees away from a competitor, have been targeted by the White House,1 the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division.2 Although the DOJ's four criminal prosecutions stemming from no-poach agreements have yet to yield any guilty verdicts for Sherman Act violations, the Seventh Circuit recently weighed in on the potential legality under the antitrust laws of employee no-poach provisions in fast-food franchise...
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
Show More