Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Abstract Humans construct rich representations of other people’s mental states. Here we investigated how intentionality in eye gaze affected perception and responses to gaze. Observers viewed videos of human gazers looking left or right. Unbeknownst to the observers, the gazers could either choose where to look (self-chosen gaze) or were explicitly instructed where to look (computer-instructed gaze).
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon. Open AccessArticle by Sarah D. McCrackin SciProfiles Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar * and Jelena Ristic SciProfiles Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar Department of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Behav. Sci.
Design. The study was a repeated measures design with three factors, Emotion (2: Happy, Neutral), Mask (3: Opaque, Clear, No Mask), and Mimicry (2: No Mimicry, Spontaneous Mimicry,). Emotion was manipulated between happy and neutral conditions by either showing a face with a happy emotional expression or a face with a neutral facial expression. Mask manipulated whether the face was shown wearing an opaque mask, a clear mask, or no mask.
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
