Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by T. M. Scanlon
Contratualismo e utilitarismo
Ayuda Buscar en la ayuda Buscar en la ayuda Contratualismo e utilitarismo [1] UEL Localización: Revista Diaphonía, ISSN-e 2446-7413, Vol. 11, Nº.1 1, 2025 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Diaphonía, v. 11, n. 1, 2025), págs. 361-394 Idioma: portugués Enlaces Texto completo
On the Very Idea of a Virtue of Self-Cultivation
Neo-Aristotelian Self-Cultivation and the Threat of Paradox Self-Cultivation and Virtue as an Ideal Does the Virtue of Self-Cultivation Generate a Regress Problem? Can Self-Cultivating Actions Be Overall Right? Is the Virtue of Self-Cultivation Superfluous?
The Difficulty of Tolerance
Crossref Citations This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef. COHEN-ALMAGOR, RAPHAEL 2006. On Compromise and Coercion. Ratio Juris, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 434. CrossRef Google Scholar Donahue, T. J. 2007. Do Critical and Normative Inquiry Conflict?. SSRN Electronic Journal, CrossRef Google Scholar Cohen-Almagor, Raphael 2007. The Scope of Tolerance: Response to Nehushtan. Israel Law Review, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 277.
The 4 biggest reasons why inequality is bad for society
It’s safe to say that economic inequality bothers us. But why? Harvard philosopher T. M. Scanlon offers four reasons we should tackle — and fix — the problem. The great inequality of income and wealth in the world, and within the United States, is deeply troubling. It seems, even to many of us who benefit from this inequality, that something should be done to reduce or eliminate it. But why should we think this?
Why Does Inequality Matter? // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews // University of Notre Dame
More than four decades of reflection on the idea of equality -- or rather inequality -- are distilled into this extremely impressive, thought-provoking, yet slim, volume. It is written in simple, jargon-free terms, originally delivered as the 2013 Oxford Uehiro Lectures. Scanlon describes his position as 'relational' and 'pluralistic', but declines to give it a name.
T. M. Scanlon: 9780199678488: Amazon.com: Books
T. M. Scanlon offers a qualified defense of normative cognitivism--the view that there are irreducibly normative truths about reasons for action. He responds to three familiar objections: that such truths would have troubling metaphysical implications; that we would have no way of knowing what they are; and that the role of reasons in motivating and explaining action could not be explained if accepting a conclusion about reasons for action were a kind of belief.
Daniel Callcut, Mill, sentimentalism and the problem of moral authority - PhilPapers
Mill’s aim in chapter 3 of Utilitarianism is to show that his revisionary moral theory can preserve the kind of authority typically and traditionally associated with moral demands. One of his main targets is the idea that if people come to believe that morality is rooted in human sentiment then they will feel less bound by moral obligation.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with T. M.
Contact T. M., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack