Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Thomas Mitty
LexisNexis Corporate Rescue And Insolvency: Case Alerter - November 2024
GC Gatehouse Chambers More Gatehouse Chambers (formerly Hardwicke) is a leading commercial chambers which specialises in arbitration and all forms of ADR, commercial dispute resolution, construction, insolvency, restructuring and company, insurance, professional liability and property disputes. It also has niche specialisms in clinical negligence and personal injury as well as private client work.
Gatehouse Chambers
CONTRIBUTING SINCE AUGUST 2021 Gatehouse Chambers (formerly Hardwicke) is a leading commercial chambers which specialises in arbitration and all forms of ADR, commercial dispute resolution, construction, insolvency, restructuring and company, insurance, professional liability and property disputes. It also has niche specialisms in clinical negligence and personal injury as well as private client work.
RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV: Reasonable Endeavours Provisos Do Not Require Parties To Accept Non-contractual Performance
The Supreme Court has given judgment in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV [2024] UKSC 18 on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a shipping contract containing a proviso that parties are to make reasonable endeavours to overcome the force majeure event. In unanimously allowing the appeal, it concluded that such proviso does not oblige parties to accept an offer of non-contractual performance – even where this would achieve the same result as contractual performance and cause no detriment.
Case Comment: CNM Estates (Tolworth Tower) Ltd V Carvill-Biggs & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 480
When is it permissible to take into account the merits of a proposed amendment in an application to amend? Does it make a difference if it is a very late amendment as opposed to a late amendment? Background In October 2015, the Claimant company ('CNM') acquired a property with the intention of developing it. The purchase price was approximately £60.5 million, of which £54 million was funded by loans.
Case comment: CNM Estates (Tolworth Tower) Ltd v Carvill-Biggs & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 480
When is it permissible to take into account the merits of a proposed amendment in an application to amend? Does it make a difference if it is a very late amendment as opposed to a late amendment? Background In October 2015, the Claimant company (‘CNM’) acquired a property with the intention of developing it. The purchase price was approximately £60.5 million, of which £54 million was funded by loans.
Unintelligent use of artificial intelligence: professional negligence and AI (in-person seminar)
Daniel Gatty , Priya Gopal , William Golightly and Thomas Mitty discuss the developing challenges that AI presents in a professional negligence context, including: If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email .
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Thomas
Contact Thomas, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack