Skip To Main Content
Valerie E. Alter on Muck Rack

Valerie E. Alter

As seen in: JD Supra, The National Law Review, Mondaq, Cannabis Law Report
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile
Back to Valerie E. Alter’s profile

Articles by Valerie E. Alter

U.S. Supreme Court Shuts Down Appeal To Overturn Los Angeles County's Ban On Flavored Tobacco

|
By Valerie E. Alter, Kent Raygor
| Cannabis Law Report Verified
Decision Upholds Sheppard Mullin’s Lower Court Victories for the County. The U.S. Supreme Court today declined to grant a petition for certiorari filed by tobacco manufacturer R.J. Reynolds and others that sought to overturn Los Angeles County’s ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

California Court of Appeal Holds that SEC Filings May Be Protected Activities Under Anti-SLAPP Statute | JD Supra

|
By Valerie E. Alter, Gian A. Ryan, John Stigi III
| JD Supra
On December 27, 2021, the California Court of Appeal issued two decisions addressing whether claims arising from statements made in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) fall within California’s statute designed to deter “strategic lawsuits against public participation,” or “SLAPPs,” arising from protected speech. In Sugarman v. Benett, No. B307753, 2021 WL 6111725  (Cal. App. Dec. 27, 2021) (“Benett”), and Sugarman v. Brown, No. B308318, 2021 WL 6111718 (Cal. App. Dec.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

California Court Of Appeal Holds That SEC Filings May Be Protected Activities Under Anti-SLAPP Statute

|
By John Stigi, Valerie E. Alter, Gian A. Ryan
| Mondaq
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. On December 27, 2021, the California Court of Appeal issued two decisions addressing whether claims arising from statements made in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) fall within California's statute designed to deter “strategic lawsuits against public participation,” or “SLAPPs,” arising from protected speech. In Sugarman v. Benett, No. B307753, 2021 WL 6111725  (Cal. App. Dec.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

California Court of Appeal Holds that SEC Filings May Be Protected Activities Under Anti-SLAPP Statute

|
By Keith Bishop, Gian A. Ryan, Valerie E. Alter
| The National Law Review Verified
Friday, January 14, 2022 On December 27, 2021, the California Court of Appeal issued two decisions addressing whether claims arising from statements made in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) fall within California’s statute designed to deter “strategic lawsuits against public participation,” or “SLAPPs,” arising from protected speech. In Sugarman v. Benett, No. B307753, 2021 WL 6111725  (Cal. App. Dec. 27, 2021) (“Benett”), and Sugarman v.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
Show More