Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Zach Sharb
Legislation: Restoring The America Invents Act
United States: Legislation: Restoring The America Invents Act 08 October 2021 by David Linden , David Cochran and Zach Sharb Jones Day Your LinkedIn Connections with the authors To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
District Court Highlights Prior PTAB Invalidation | JD Supra
On May 26, 2021, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington denied both defendant Valve Corporation’s (“Valve”) motion for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial, and plaintiff Ironburg Inventions Ltd.’s (“Ironburg”) motion for enhanced treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284.
Thin Fintiv Factor Four Stipulation Sufficient For Institution
United States: Thin Fintiv Factor Four Stipulation Sufficient For Institution 21 May 2021 by Matthew W. Johnson and Zach Sharb Jones Day Your LinkedIn Connections with the authors To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. On April 30, 2021, the PTAB instituted IPR trials based on petitions by Facebook, Inc.
Thin Fintiv Factor Four Stipulation Sufficient For Institution | JD Supra
On April 30, 2021, Facebook, Inc. (“Petitioner”) filed a pair of Petitions to institute inter partes review of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,645,300 (“300 Patent”), owned by USC IP Partnership, L.P. (“Patent Owner”) and directed towards a system for determining a website visitor’s intent and proposing further webpages for that visitor. (Decision at 3).
Secondary Considerations Unhelpful Second Time Around | Lexology
On February 26, 2021, the PTAB found in favor of Fox Factory, Inc. (“Fox”) on remand and cancelled the challenged claims of SRAM LLC’s (“SRAM”) U.S. Patent No. 9,182,027 (the ’027 Patent), directed towards anchoring a bicycle’s drive chain and preventing its disengagement from the chainring. The case had been remanded by the Federal Circuit for revisiting of the PTAB’s handling of secondary consideration nexus.
Secondary Considerations Unhelpful Second Time Around | JD Supra
On February 26, 2021, the PTAB found in favor of Fox Factory, Inc. (“Fox”) on remand and cancelled the challenged claims of SRAM LLC’s (“SRAM”) U.S. Patent No. 9,182,027 (the ’027 Patent), directed towards anchoring a bicycle’s drive chain and preventing its disengagement from the chainring. The case had been remanded by the Federal Circuit for revisiting of the PTAB’s handling of secondary consideration nexus.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Zach
Contact Zach, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack