A. Serpa Neto on Muck Rack

A. Serpa Neto

As seen in: Dialnet - Universidad de La Rioja
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with A. Serpa

Contact A. Serpa, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Factores de riesgo para PPC en cirugía abdominal laparoscópica no robótica frente a la laparoscópica robótica (LapRas): Razonamiento y protocolo mediante un análisis a nivel de paciente de LAS VEGAS y AVATaR

|
By A. Serpa Neto, M. Schultz, S. C. Serafini, E. Tschernko
| Dialnet - Universidad de La Rioja
Ayuda Buscar en la ayuda Buscar en la ayuda Factores de riesgo para PPC en cirugía abdominal laparoscópica no robótica frente a la laparoscópica robótica (LapRas): Razonamiento y protocolo mediante un análisis a nivel de paciente de LAS VEGAS y AVATaR Autores: S. C. Serafini, S. N. T. Hemmes, A. Serpa Neto, M. J. Schultz, E. Tschernko, M. Gama de Abreu, G. Mazzinari, L. Ball Localización: Revista española de anestesiología y reanimación, ISSN 0034-9356, Vol. 71, Nº.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Intraoperative ventilation settings and their associations with postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients

|
By L. Ball, Integrated Diagnostics, A. Serpa Neto, S. N. T. Hemmes
| bjanaesthesia.org
Publication HistoryPublished online: June 01, 2018Accepted: April 18, 2018;
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

The fragility of statistically significant findings in randomised controlled anaesthesiology trials: systematic review of the medical literature

|
By L. Ball, Integrated Diagnostics, G. Mazzinari, A. Serpa Neto
| bjanaesthesia.org
The results of this systematic review can be summarised as follows; 1) the FI of randomised controlled anaesthesiology trials is often low, and 2) numbers of patients lost to follow-up with regard to the primary endpoint frequently exceed the FI. In addition, 3) the FI increases with a larger sample size and higher numbers of primary events, and 4) with lower P-values.Our investigation has several strengths.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 3 articles
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified