Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Adam Rizk
Has There Been A Sea Change In Eligible Domestic Industries At The ITC That Will Last?
Introduction For decades, the ITC's jurisdictional requirement – known as the domestic industry requirement – effectively shut out innovators from availing themselves of the powerful remedies of the forum, in the form of an exclusion order on imports, if those innovators had significant U.S. investments in sales and marketing of their patented inventions, but lacked other U.S. based manufacturing or research expenditures.
Six critical tips to develop disruptive technology IP strategies
Shutterstock/Owlie Productions Innovating disruptive technology – like electric vehicle batteries – is expensive, but defending patent litigation is more – that’s why innovators must consider IP strategy To read more Register for limited access Register to receive our newsletter and gain limited access to subscriber content. Register now Subscribe to unlock unlimited access Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the IAM experts. Subscribe now Already have access?
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
In the wake of the Supreme Court's elimination of "Chevron deference" in the Loper decision, many commentators have suggested that the ITC's authority over unfair imports under Section 337 might be curtailed. See Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 2024 U.S. LEXIS 2882 (June 28, 2024).
Federal Circuit Rejects Google’s Bid To Shrink ITC Jurisdiction over Post-Importation Acts of Indirect Infringement
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s elimination of “Chevron deference” in the Loper decision, many commentators have suggested that the ITC’s authority over unfair imports under Section 337 might be curtailed. See Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 2024 U.S. LEXIS 2882 (June 28, 2024).
Assessing The Impact Of Recent Supreme Court Decisions On Section 337 Practice - Less Than Meets The Eye?
Late last month, the Supreme Court issued two opinions which seemingly shook up the field of administrative law. As explained in this article, however, while both decisions bear significantly on certain administrative agencies, neither of these decisions are likely to present significant changes to Section 337 practice at the International Trade Commission.
A Practical Guide
Today, let's talk about a subject that is very important if you want to improve your Java skills. It is called design patterns but before we continue let me tell you one thing: they are not just some fancy words thrown around during meetings about software development. They are proven methods that can help you with solving typical problems in designing code.
Demystifying Java wait(), notify(), and join() methods for multithreading: An in-depth look
The wait() and notify() methods in Java allow the programmer to precisely define when the waiting thread will resume in relation to the worker thread. The worker thread need not terminate — it can continue running after waking up the waiting thread. To understand this better, let’s contrast the wait() and notify() methods with join(). The join() method achieves thread synchronization by making the waiting thread pause until the worker thread has fully executed and terminates.
Pancreatic regional blood flow links the endocrine and exocrine diseases
Abstract An increasing number of studies have demonstrated that disease states of the endocrine or exocrine pancreas aggravate one another, which implies bidirectional blood flow between islets and exocrine cells. However, this is inconsistent with the current model of unidirectional blood flow, which is strictly from islets to exocrine tissues. This conventional model was first proposed in 1932, and it has never to our knowledge been revisited to date.
When It Isn't Better Late Than Never: ALJ Reins In On Redesigns First Disclosed In The Last Week Of Fact Discovery
United States: When It Isn't Better Late Than Never: ALJ Reins In On Redesigns First Disclosed In The Last Week Of Fact Discovery 23 September 2021 by Michael T. Renaud , Adam Rizk , Matthew Karambelas and Tianyi Tan Mintz Your LinkedIn Connections with the authors To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Levelling the playing field in ITC patent cases by identifying redesigns to a set deadline
Respondents are leaving it later and later to disclose potential design arounds that may allow them to circumvent findings of patent infringement at the ITC, write Michael Renaud, Adam Rizk, and Matthew Karambelas of Mintz Levin. But all is not lost for complainants Returning user? Enter your details below to log into your account. E-Mail Address: Password: I am not on a shared computer, please remember me for my next visit. Want to read more?
IPR And Fast-Moving District Court Litigation: PTAB Formalizes The Analysis For Balancing Efficiency And Fairness - Intellectual Property - United States
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice): Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below. Mondaq has a "free to view" business model.
IPR and Fast-Moving District Court Litigation: PTAB Formalizes the Analysis for Balancing Efficiency and Fairness | JD Supra
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) has designated two key institution decisions as “Informative.” With these informative decisions, the PTAB has provided guidance on how the PTAB will apply efficiency and fairness factors that guide decisions to institute an inter partes review (“IPR”) when there is a fast-moving parallel district court litigation that may reach trial before the PTAB’s final written decision would be due.
Shifting
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice): Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below. Mondaq has a "free to view" business model.
Shifting “Sands”: New Facts on the Ground Justify Institution of a Previously-Denied IPR | JD Supra
In a rare reversal, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) reassessed the Fintiv factors in a decision on a petition for rehearing of a previous decision denying institution of an inter partes review (“IPR”). The PTAB had previously declined to institute the IPR filed by Sand Revolution against Continental Intermodal due to the advanced state of a parallel district court litigation. In its recent reversal, the PTAB reveals several strategic options for future litigants to consider.
Infringement Contentions: Fair Notice?
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice): Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below. Mondaq has a "free to view" business model.
Infringement Contentions: Fair Notice? | JD Supra
Updated: May 25, 2018: JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.
Efficacy of Preliminary Injunction Against Apple Called into Question | JD Supra
Updated: May 25, 2018: JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.
Efficacy of Preliminary Injunction against Apple Called into Question?
Wednesday, December 12, 2018 The Fuzhou Intermediate People’s Court in China issued a preliminary injunction against Apple in connection with two patents asserted by Qualcomm.
TechConnect - Your Law Firm Link to Industry News - April 2018 | JD Supra
As Tolstoy once wrote, “Spring is the time of plans and projects.” Hopefully, the snows of winter are finally behind us, and it’s time to look forward, build, and create! We at Mintz Levin continue to work with amazing companies that intend to make a dent in the universe.
AI: The Path of the Future or Industry Hype? | JD Supra
Artificial intelligence (AI) — the science of teaching a machine how to “think” — has its roots in the 1950s. But until recently, it was considered a niche that was reserved for academics and government-sponsored research programs. And even today, AI’s overarching vision — building a machine that can exhibit the general intelligence of a human being — remains aspirational. Nonetheless, companies are now racing to integrate AI into everything from self-driving cars to diagnosis of medical disease.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Adam
Contact Adam, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack