Alexander Rushforth

Results The included data sets consisted of 55 individual interviews and transcripts of 14 focus groups (with 171 participants in total) comprising approximately 1450 pages of text. It was evident that the shift towards remote assessment at the start of the pandemic (driven primarily by infection control considerations) was accompanied by a strong pressure on patients to ‘stay home’ and on both staff and patients to ‘protect the NHS’.

Safety implications of remote assessments for suspected COVID-19: qualitative study in UK primary care http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7758-8493Sietse Wieringa1, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-7211Ana Luisa Neves2, Alexander Rushforth1,3, Emma Ladds1, Laiba Husain1, Teresa Finlay1, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-6702Catherine Pope1,4, Trisha Greenhalgh1 1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 2 Centre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health...

Safety implications of remote assessments for suspected COVID-19: qualitative study in UK primary care http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7758-8493Sietse Wieringa1, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-7211Ana Luisa Neves2, Alexander Rushforth1,3, Emma Ladds1, Laiba Husain1, Teresa Finlay1, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-6702Catherine Pope1,4, Trisha Greenhalgh1 1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 2 Centre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health...