Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Access options Subscribe to this journal Receive 13 print issues and online access $259.00 per year only $19.92 per issue Rent or buy this article Prices vary by article type from$1.95 to$39.95 Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout Additional access options: Log in Learn about institutional subscriptions Read our FAQs Contact customer support References Gorka SM, Radoman M, Jimmy J,...
Abstract Empirical audit and review is an approach to assessing the evidentiary value of a research area. It involves identifying a topic and selecting a cross-section of studies for replication. We apply the method to research on the psychological consequences of scarcity.
cross Cultures Moore et al: Overconfidence AArt. 36, page 17 of 19 Author Contributions • Contributed to conception and design: DAM • Contributed to acquisition of data: DAM, ASD, EYG • Contributed to analysis and interpretation of data: ASD, EYG, DAM • Drafted and/or revised the article: DAM, ASD, EYG • Approved the submitted version for publication: DAM References Acker, D., & Duck, N. W. (2008). Cross-cultural overconfidence and biased self-attribution.
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
