Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Andrew Carlson
Ontario Court Of Appeal Issues Decision In
The Ontario Court of Appeal, following the guidance issued by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v Pointes Protection Association1 (Pointes Protection) and Hansman v Neufeld2 (Neufeld), has issued its much-anticipated decision in The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v West Face Capital Inc., 2023 ONCA 381.
Ontario Court of Appeal Issues Decision in The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v West Face Capital Inc. | JD Supra
June 7, 2023 Andrew Carlson, Matthew Milne-Smith, Maura O'Sullivan Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP + Follow x Following x Following - Unfollow Contact To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: The Ontario Court of Appeal, following the guidance issued by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v Pointes Protection Association1 (Pointes Protection) and Hansman v Neufeld2 (Neufeld), has issued its much-anticipated decision in The Catalyst Capital Group Inc.
Canada's Top Court Confirms Anti-SLAPP Motions Protect Speakers, Not Plaintiffs
The Supreme Court of Canada, in commenting on anti-SLAPP1 legislation for the third time in the span of three years, has confirmed that even potentially meritorious claims must be dismissed if the public interest in the defendant's expression outweighs the public interest in allowing the proceeding to continue. This decision, in Hansman v Neufeld, provides valuable guidance on the application of the anti-SLAPP framework in British Columbia, Ontario and other provinces.
Canada’s Top Court Confirms Anti-SLAPP Motions Protect Speakers, Not Plaintiffs | JD Supra
The Supreme Court of Canada, in commenting on anti-SLAPP1 legislation for the third time in the span of three years, has confirmed that even potentially meritorious claims must be dismissed if the public interest in the defendant’s expression outweighs the public interest in allowing the proceeding to continue. This decision, in Hansman v Neufeld, provides valuable guidance on the application of the anti-SLAPP framework in British Columbia, Ontario and other provinces.
Canada’s Top Court Confirms Anti-SLAPP Motions Protect Speakers, Not Plaintiffs
The Supreme Court of Canada, in commenting on anti-SLAPP1 legislation for the third time in the span of three years, has confirmed that even potentially meritorious claims must be dismissed if the public interest in the defendant’s expression outweighs the public interest in allowing the proceeding to continue. This decision, in Hansman v Neufeld, provides valuable guidance on the application of the anti-SLAPP framework in British Columbia, Ontario and other provinces.
Speed, Lies and Creativity: When It's Time to Step Up the Pace
Commercial creativity loves a process slide. Problem, strategy, insight, idea, execution. It makes everything feel accessible to the people not making the work. The accumulation of value that crisp, clean phases imply. At the end (and not before, never before) you get what you briefed in at the beginning. A concept. Some app screens. The script for a :15. Our industry celebrates the idea of work that happens in discrete steps shown in tidy phases. Gantt charts marching down and to the right.
"MicroRNA Analysis of Human Stroke Brain Tissue Resected during Decompr" by Andrew P. Carlson, William McKay et al.
Abstract BACKGROUND: Signaling pathways mediated by microRNAs (miRNAs) have been identified as one of the mechanisms that regulate stroke progression and recovery. Recent investigations using stroke patient blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) demonstrated disease-specific alterations in miRNA expression. In this study, for the first time, we investigated miRNA expression signatures in freshly removed human stroke brain tissue.
Canada's Top Court Provides Guidance On SLAPPs
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. Overview Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) are lawsuits that are intended not to seek justice, but instead to intimidate and silence critics. Regardless of the merits of its underlying claim, a well-heeled plaintiff is often able to drag the critic through costly and time-consuming litigation.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Andrew
Contact Andrew, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack