Skip To Main Content
Andrew Satter on Muck Rack

Andrew Satter

Verified
Washington, D.C.
As seen in: Bloomberg Government, Bloomberg Law, Bloomberg Tax, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Center for American Progress, Bloomberg Environment, Bloomberg Industry Group, Daily Tax Report
Deputy Executive Producer at @BLaw, @BGov, @Tax. Former @amprog, @cqrollcall @tucsonstar @praguepost. Proud New Mexican (yes Homer, there's a new one).
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Andrew

Contact Andrew, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Kalshi, Polymarket: Gambling or Financial Products Under US Law? Original

|
By Andrew Satter Verified
| Bloomberg Law Verified
Prediction markets, which allow people to put money on everything from elections to sporting events, have grown into a multibillion dollar industry. Their rapid expansion has triggered a wave of lawsuits over one fundamental question: who gets to regulate them, states or the federal government? States argue many of the contracts offered on prediction market platforms are simply another form of gambling and fall under state gaming laws.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (2) Issue with article?

Has the Major Questions Doctrine Given Judges Too Much Power? Original

|
By Andrew Satter Verified
| Bloomberg Law Verified
When the Supreme Court struck down Donald Trump’s tariffs in February 2026, several justices relied on a doctrine that has rapidly become central to the court’s power over federal agencies: the Major Questions Doctrine. It holds that agencies must point to clear congressional authorization when they take actions of major political or economic significance, with courts ultimately deciding what counts as “major” and how clear Congress must be.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (2) Issue with article?

Coca-Cola’s $6 Billion Tax Fight: How Transfer Pricing Works

|
By Andrew Satter Verified, Josh Block
| Bloomberg Law Verified
In 2020, a US Tax Court largely upheld the IRS’s transfer pricing adjustments against Coca-Cola. That left the company facing about $2.7 billion in additional taxes after the court found the company had under-reported income from transactions between its overseas affiliates. With interest, the total swelled to roughly $6 billion. Coke is appealing the decision.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (2) Issue with article?
See all 103 articles