Skip To Main Content
Beth Bareham on Muck Rack

Beth Bareham

As seen in: Wiley Online Library, medRxiv
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Beth

Contact Beth, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

The lived experiences of people dying with frailty: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies exploring patients, relatives and professionals views

|
By Daniel Stow, Beth Bareham, Felicity Dewhurst, Elizabeth Westhead
| medRxiv
The authors have declared no competing interest. DS and BKB were supported by NIHR School For Primary Care Research launching fellowships, EW was supported by Newcastle University institutional funding, BH is funded by the Applied Research Collaboration. I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (13) Issue with article?

The acceptability of alcohol screening and brief intervention for older adults in community venues

|
By Jennifer Seddon, Beth Bareham, Eileen Kaner, Barbara Hanratty
| Wiley Online Library Verified
1 INTRODUCTION Hazardous alcohol use is defined as a pattern of alcohol consumption that increases the risk of associated physical, psychological or social harm for the user or others [1]. Increasing numbers of older adults (aged ≥50 years) consume alcohol at hazardous levels.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Regression towards the mean-a plea for civility in peer review

|
By Rahul Rao, Beth Bareham
| bmj.com
Finding solutions So, how can we make the peer review experience better for authors? Some responsibility lies with journals. It is up to editors to tie together the responses from peer review and communicate them in a way that gives authors the confidence to carry out a major revision or, in the case of a decision to reject, provides them with enough information to act on before considering submission to another journal.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 3 licensed articles (4 Total)