BH Al Wattar

Objective To compare rates of vaginal delivery and adverse outcomes of instrumental delivery trials in obstetric theatre compared to primary emergency full dilation caesarean section. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting University teaching hospital. Population Women with singleton, non-anomalous, pregnancy undergoing instrumental delivery trial in obstetric theatre. Methods Data were collected from consecutive cases during 2014 until 2018 using clinical records.

Abstract Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic is disrupting health services worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Design Interview‐based national survey. Setting Women's healthcare units in the National Health Service. Population Junior doctors in obstetrics and gynaecology.

Mini commentary BH Al Wattar Corresponding Author E-mail address: dr.basselwa@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-9271 Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Search for more papers by this author For years, practising gynaecologists adopted a sound and simple surgical principle when treating women with ovarian torsion (OT): necrotic ischaemic tissue has to be excised and discarded. As such, the radical cure of oophorectomy was the standard option.