Skip To Main Content
Brandon Barnes Trickett on Muck Rack

Brandon Barnes Trickett

As seen in: Lexology, Mondaq
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Brandon Barnes

Contact Brandon Barnes, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Supreme Court Of Canada Considers The Meaning Of "Material Change" In Canadian Securities Law And Clarifies The Test For Leave To Proceed With A Secondary Market Securities Class Action

|
By Matthew Fleming, Brandon Barnes Trickett, Benjamin Iscoe, Janson Fu
| Mondaq
Dentons Canada LLP are most popular: within Technology and Tax topic(s) with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy, Banking & Credit and Healthcare industries On November 28, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada released its highly anticipated decision Lundin Mining Corporation v. Markowich,1 addressing the meaning of "material change" in Canadian securities law.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (2) Issue with article?

Supreme Court of Canada dismisses application to strike for abuse of process against Metis Nations

|
By Brandon Barnes Trickett, Thomas Nichini
| Lexology Verified
Introduction On February 28, 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) dismissed an appeal by the Government of Saskatchewan in Saskatchewan (Environment) v. Métis Nation – Saskatchewan,[1] which sought to strike certain paragraphs of an application for judicial review by the Métis Nation – Saskatchewan (MNS) on grounds of abuse of process. The underlying application concerned Saskatchewan’s duty to consult and MNS’ claims of Aboriginal title and commercial harvesting rights.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

So long, Shareholder Rule ─ What this means for companies and shareholders

|
By Brandon Barnes Trickett, Raphael Eghan
| Lexology Verified
In a landmark decision, the Commercial Division of the High Court of England and Wales held that the longstanding “Shareholder Rule” is unjustified and should no longer be applied in English law.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 13 articles