Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Brittanee Petrik
A Unique Solution to COVID-19-Related Delays At the U.S. International Trade Commission
Analysis In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the ITC was forced to suspend in-person hearings and halt its fast-paced schedules while it explored existing technological resources and reliable and secure options available for video conferencing that would protect parties’ confidential business information (CBI).
A Unique Solution to COVID-19-Related Delays At the U.S. International Trade Commission
The Intellectual Property Strategist Insurance Law International Law Patent Litigation In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the ITC was forced to suspend in-person hearings and halt its fast-paced schedules while it explored existing technological resources and reliable and secure options available for video conferencing that would protect parties’ confidential business information (CBI).
A Unique Solution to COVID-19-Related Delays at the U.S. International Trade Commission | JD Supra
Under Section 337, [1] the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC or Commission) investigates allegations of unfair practices in import trade that most often involve claims regarding intellectual property rights, including allegations of patent infringement. The ITC has long been the forum of choice for IP litigants seeking expeditious relief "at the earliest practicable time," [2] particularly when compared to the traditional pace of litigation in district court.
Best Ways to Use Patent Venue Discovery After TC Heartland | JD Supra
This article was published in Law360 on April 28, 2020. © Copyright 2020, Portfolio Media, Inc., publisher of Law360. It is republished here with permission. Nearly three years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland LLC v.
Best Ways To Use Patent Venue Discovery After TC Heartland
Law360 (April 27, 2020, 1:53 PM EDT) -- Nearly three years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Brands LLC,[1] both parties and courts continue to grapple with what it means for a defendant to have a regular and established place of business in a judicial district that is not where a named domestic defendant in a patent infringement case is either incorporated or resides.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Brittanee
Contact Brittanee, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack