Skip To Main Content
Brittany Barrientos on Muck Rack

Brittany Barrientos

As seen in: Bloomberg Law, JD Supra, LexBlog, The Beacon Media, Practice Source
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Brittany

Contact Brittany, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Unanimous D.C. Circuit Ruling Keeps PFOA and PFOS "Forever Chemicals" Within CERCLA's Reach

|
By Brittany Barrientos, Andrew Davis, Sarah Lintecum Struby
| stinson.com
Key Takeaways On August 18, 2026, a unanimous D.C. Circuit panel kept perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)—two of the most common "forever chemicals"—inside the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act's (CERCLA) "hazardous substance" regime and rejected industry challengers' effort to vacate the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) designation.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Enforcement of Oregon's EPR Law Enjoined by Federal District Court, Creating Additional Uncertainty for Producers | JD Supra

|
By Brittany Barrientos, Nathan Isom
| JD Supra
The new world of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) state laws may be facing big changes in the coming months. On February 6, the federal judge in National Association of Wholesaler‑Distributors v. Feldon, issued an order that enjoined the application of Oregon's EPR statute to National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors (NAW) and its members. EPR statutes have sprung up in seven major states, including Minnesota and California.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Enforcement of Oregon's EPR Law Enjoined by Federal District Court, Creating Additional Uncertainty for Producers

|
By Brittany Barrientos, Claire Williams, Nathan Isom
| stinson.com
Alert By Brittany Barrientos, Claire Williams & Nathan Isom The new world of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) state laws may be facing big changes in the coming months. On February 6, the federal judge in National Association of Wholesaler‑Distributors v. Feldon, issued an order that enjoined the application of Oregon's EPR statute to National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors (NAW) and its members. EPR statutes have sprung up in seven major states, including Minnesota and California.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 60 articles